On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 at 15:38, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > An upcoming change will add 'userprogs' to the kunit subdirectory. > For kbuild to properly clean up these build artifacts the subdirectory > needs to be always processed. > > Pushing the special logic for hook.o into the kunit Makefile also makes the > logic easier to understand. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh > --- I'm quite happy with this. Reviewed-by: David Gow Cheers, -- David > lib/Makefile | 4 ---- > lib/kunit/Makefile | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile > index c38582f187dd81916113319072e5cfef26f26c84..698566135091cc3bf0054f1954b434dc3325364a 100644 > --- a/lib/Makefile > +++ b/lib/Makefile > @@ -108,11 +108,7 @@ test_fpu-y := test_fpu_glue.o test_fpu_impl.o > CFLAGS_test_fpu_impl.o += $(CC_FLAGS_FPU) > CFLAGS_REMOVE_test_fpu_impl.o += $(CC_FLAGS_NO_FPU) > > -# Some KUnit files (hooks.o) need to be built-in even when KUnit is a module, > -# so we can't just use obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT). > -ifdef CONFIG_KUNIT > obj-y += kunit/ > -endif > > ifeq ($(CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT),y) > CFLAGS_kobject.o += -DDEBUG > diff --git a/lib/kunit/Makefile b/lib/kunit/Makefile > index 5aa51978e456ab3bb60c12071a26cf2bdcb1b508..656f1fa35abcc635e67d5b4cb1bc586b48415ac5 100644 > --- a/lib/kunit/Makefile > +++ b/lib/kunit/Makefile > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ kunit-objs += debugfs.o > endif > > # KUnit 'hooks' are built-in even when KUnit is built as a module. > -obj-y += hooks.o > +obj-$(if $(CONFIG_KUNIT),y) += hooks.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) += kunit-test.o > obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) += platform-test.o > > -- > 2.49.0 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "KUnit Development" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kunit-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kunit-dev/20250611-kunit-kselftests-v3-11-55e3d148cbc6%40linutronix.de.