From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=51.159.59.229 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794573910; b=ytXLgB5sqkzenp+JlF3HFkKqcK4kAmeOZRSOXpCd9GmIf+f2S5ODtueLegQMPKhRHkaA YRncqC1nkAapyl8xHHit3Z8JA6CePGUR8u0Zp1I6+xRNLzIhGoIYZSpzX4UPqqmFTVX1W EUOH8ctVFVzPqY3guhV8mND++tVC6G0SYfO7CeBlcF1pUMk+IeahQrGbfmmgAjj7yiBvE 9XAToS5Ma9cwHnI5cRbbCVL1rJ7rhilcyipof74TMhNlVioLi+Yh2BNmwe6KvOV/21yeN yNtzDH9pjCQx6wy1Pew6XPHuBCQXtbjtcmGyo48XB8iQ53iGl9dDbJqLSPDQS4O3X+A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794573910; h=DMARC-Filter:DKIM-Signature:Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject: Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition: In-Reply-To; bh=0RwBi1DXr0zgZdIiYyh+9mcJNVIQ1eSv6Kimn0za8QU=; b=jJ66ARhyPn2x8pnCqk3e51B5KFH1TsUgEpBQ2nOX/f13BsbXk+cgA3Wb/Gng7589o+sD KTORD/iZzk9f4Y1aphdHR1gckzLppe71wFVwn4iYt5v3kAT86+LI5pbQEmPerJfkTcpgp OfNfZ7GJ0ldeOpsyGGf7ibumzB/c3XLByjjxVCmMedB7QCQ97aeCYxibNV96PcFwqVcH+ dZECcVrHSaF60oKSqqqA3Ajp6tONU6V9YamJbTrd57rhZZVUFNguLusX6B3UaSq8ytweq e1IOQe5x5ShoFp5eZEBpv1dx/U73rFYWqMCPX9bUOf3aDEzo6L+ZugtHlewhWcn7DpA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=1wt.eu; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=1wt.eu; dkim=pass header.d=1wt.eu header.i=@1wt.eu header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=BhKte5E6; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=51.159.59.229 Received: from mta1.formilux.org (mta1.formilux.org [51.159.59.229]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0506B606A32D; Fri, 13 Nov 2026 12:45:08 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 0506B606A32D Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=1wt.eu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=1wt.eu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=1wt.eu header.i=@1wt.eu header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=BhKte5E6 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1wt.eu; s=mail; t=1794573900; bh=0RwBi1DXr0zgZdIiYyh+9mcJNVIQ1eSv6Kimn0za8QU=; h=From:Message-ID:From; b=BhKte5E6rAHzy2FaV2ZYYjDDk7VS4RSxmJ8xHeifRWlHSuf9/MmD7fUYfhffOJzUe KImvnqORiDCVCkY34NbXEYy73I8sFny6pZ5RoHqOUlxittXhE20fXVFBFIWV5nnk6t 0BIfwxj8wpuzU5YLqktizqy4r3hsIXezWxrZJ+Bs= Received: from 1wt.eu (ded1.1wt.eu [163.172.96.212]) by mta1.formilux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BCD6C0954; Fri, 13 Nov 2026 13:45:00 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 13:44:59 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau To: Johan Hovold Cc: Jonathan Corbet , skhan@linuxfoundation.org, Randy Dunlap , workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] security-bugs doc updates Message-ID: References: <20261109080240.29444-1-w@1wt.eu> X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Nov 13, 2026 at 01:07:36PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2026 at 09:02:26AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > Here comes a new batch of updates for the security bugs doc, > > essentially to make it more readable and to address some of its > > apparent contradictions for those not reading it entirely. Some > > additions were made to explain how to send a patch and a reproducer > > separately, and to ask that first-time reporters send a single > > report at once first. > > These all look good to me too, so feel free to add: > > Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold > > I'll respond to individual patches with a few comments on language that > you may consider for a v2. Sure, I'll consider them, they all look valid, many thanks Johan! Willy