From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90D7832B11D for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2026 06:39:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780900776; cv=none; b=ExvPTWdhC4PDMfhMUsEVhnILO+C7NsoO3t307NoKMRmHY2IyQlxK1rJG2RhOQDS26Nen+gWOt98JLRtCGJW5eD4INOwnKOaiRBy/V3jRu7sXvGgQEIG6mBbW+noX9hhPKh7j19H0smHeAnqCEdnz6u+1NRwOOTADAmY7dLEWaqU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780900776; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Glbienq7OB1yv1tWm9EG78YSwwzuPbUiIwxXEUvGvWI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=UuJu2hGfO44998aP27RrllWW1WoXBrUh2o/3W/6zicfCzDJaQ5/hoCEslYpmnPjh2HQlD+soi2T8uSp3mJVU+8WlZ1WoYnNc93k/EJ7Vj/Mn4Y0tCbk2G/FljIUEAwiGEwyjK9XkM0qX9rtJClaxGjBqKIC3ZsIFWhUGK9NOMBY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=ANLhgeOr; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=Y/vjgTbb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="ANLhgeOr"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="Y/vjgTbb" Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2026 08:39:32 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1780900774; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Glbienq7OB1yv1tWm9EG78YSwwzuPbUiIwxXEUvGvWI=; b=ANLhgeOrMuNZ6IZA2i4/itSMDwblxu1Xigpy8I4SA2jA5Nk5fI58+3GYi4l+GLTy5syJ+e OqDVWmI2IozwPBJh6Iu6Fmf764yi2R5lR+1/DoZsE1rlAVnkD5jPaYIqp8qb+a9sOipoIi fRP1JdDWxzVQZ7iQwF73p/jLBOA7A5GfYQbiHjGHucb0iveDEzhy9DvuSZxhODyw1nWG/6 Ul5C33gvU6CA4vtxjyIPzAo+sjbj9DuHKYJt28Ou9uZwu1/INtfZWlp2LjBmkdZiMo+J05 XE/EaZkwaOH0/j1XlPIsjcPCo+07Xg95xpDURsYXXm0Ymx0UW7oLcLIw1Sh90w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1780900774; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Glbienq7OB1yv1tWm9EG78YSwwzuPbUiIwxXEUvGvWI=; b=Y/vjgTbbn67A9R417hPVhMCX7vUE30TbKdSiHNsWIPc4s8lKU2s9cFGeLhGI2/H69VXLam LyVY0ddTw/ASO4Bw== From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Maciej Wieczor-Retman , Dave Hansen , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Cooper , "H. Peter Anvin" , Christian Ludloff , Sohil Mehta , John Ogness , x86@kernel.org, x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 004/120] x86/cpuid: Introduce Message-ID: References: <20260601194150.GDah3gfjoIZIByCa3d@fat_crate.local> <20260601203452.GAah3s7FevsRDFT7rF@fat_crate.local> <20260601225306.GDah4NUvJwaqQem4VQ@fat_crate.local> <20260602174746.GJah8XQvEJo9UKru1l@fat_crate.local> <20260603003129.GCah914Tc9sEpO4Nxl@fat_crate.local> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260603003129.GCah914Tc9sEpO4Nxl@fat_crate.local> On Tue, 02 Jun 2026, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > My only goal is to have an official release with all known issues addressed I guess that's everyone's goal :) > and not release something which is clearly wrong and luserspace starts > depending on it and then we'll have to support it forever. You mentioned that several times. How can userspace depend on an internal x86 kernel header? Thanks, Ahmed