From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, zeffron@riotgames.com
Cc: brouer@redhat.com, xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Should we remove xdp-newbies from kernel patch CC-list?
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 23:38:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wogsxl4g.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190708.143147.1283579050790858840.davem@davemloft.net>
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes:
> From: Zvi Effron <zeffron@riotgames.com>
> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 12:28:52 -0500
>
>> On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 9:19 AM Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Question to people subscribed to xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org mailing
>>> list. As you likely have noticed, patches and kbuild-bot is sending
>>> XDP related kernel stuff to this mailing list. This is caused by being
>>> listed in the kernel MAINTAINERS file[1].
>>>
>>
>> I cast my vote for both. Having the named newbies channel send many,
>> many messages with kernel patches is intimidating to new people (and
>> somewhat spammy) which makes it harder to convince my team to sign up
>> for the list. At the same time, I've appreciated being able to see
>> what's happening on patches as well as questions and discussions.
>>
>> Would it make sense/be possible to create a mailing list for the
>> maintainers file and discussions on patches that is separate from the
>> newbies channel? I have to say, the newbies channel is the only newbie
>> friendly kernel mailing list I've seen, and it's a big part of why I
>> pushed for my company to use XDP over DPDK.
>
> The bpf and netdev lists act as incubators for XDP discussion, so I don't
> know if it's worth making an xdp-devel or something like that.
I'd worry that it would fragment the discussion too much?
-Toke
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-08 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-04 14:19 Should we remove xdp-newbies from kernel patch CC-list? Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-07-05 13:24 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-07-05 18:08 ` Arthur Gautier
2019-07-05 18:48 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-07-29 12:09 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-07-08 17:28 ` Zvi Effron
2019-07-08 21:31 ` David Miller
2019-07-08 21:38 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wogsxl4g.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zeffron@riotgames.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox