* Event channel performance optimize
@ 2010-04-23 15:05 qiushanggao
2010-04-26 20:07 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: qiushanggao @ 2010-04-23 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 273 bytes --]
I find the question: inter-domain event only can be send to domain's vcpu0
in Xen, so that dom0's vcpu0 deal with the all domU's network and disk
request; but my computer have 8 physical cpu;
anybody find the question? and anybody tell me how to optimize the question?
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2625 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Event channel performance optimize
2010-04-23 15:05 Event channel performance optimize qiushanggao
@ 2010-04-26 20:07 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-04-26 20:52 ` Keir Fraser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pasi Kärkkäinen @ 2010-04-26 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qiushanggao; +Cc: xen-devel, Keir Fraser
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:05:43PM +0800, qiushanggao wrote:
> I find the question: inter-domain event only can be send to domain's
> vcpu0 in Xen, so that dom0's vcpu0 deal with the all domU's network and
> disk request; but my computer have 8 physical cpu;
>
> anybody find the question? and anybody tell me how to optimize the
> question?
Maybe Keir can comment on this one..
-- Pasi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Event channel performance optimize
2010-04-26 20:07 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
@ 2010-04-26 20:52 ` Keir Fraser
2010-04-26 21:33 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Keir Fraser @ 2010-04-26 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pasi Kärkkäinen, qiushanggao; +Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
On 26/04/2010 21:07, "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@iki.fi> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:05:43PM +0800, qiushanggao wrote:
>> I find the question: inter-domain event only can be send to domain's
>> vcpu0 in Xen, so that dom0's vcpu0 deal with the all domU's network and
>> disk request; but my computer have 8 physical cpu;
>>
>> anybody find the question? and anybody tell me how to optimize the
>> question?
>
> Maybe Keir can comment on this one..
It's not true. An event can be delivered to any dom0 vcpu. They are
presented as a type of irq to the dom0 kernel, and hence normal Linux
load-balancing strategies such as irqbalanced will apply.
-- Keir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Event channel performance optimize
2010-04-26 20:52 ` Keir Fraser
@ 2010-04-26 21:33 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-04-26 21:49 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-04-27 5:47 ` Keir Fraser
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pasi Kärkkäinen @ 2010-04-26 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keir Fraser; +Cc: qiushanggao, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 09:52:43PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 26/04/2010 21:07, "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@iki.fi> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:05:43PM +0800, qiushanggao wrote:
> >> I find the question: inter-domain event only can be send to domain's
> >> vcpu0 in Xen, so that dom0's vcpu0 deal with the all domU's network and
> >> disk request; but my computer have 8 physical cpu;
> >>
> >> anybody find the question? and anybody tell me how to optimize the
> >> question?
> >
> > Maybe Keir can comment on this one..
>
> It's not true. An event can be delivered to any dom0 vcpu. They are
> presented as a type of irq to the dom0 kernel, and hence normal Linux
> load-balancing strategies such as irqbalanced will apply.
>
I think he meant domUs and dom0.. does the same apply to domUs?
-- Pasi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Event channel performance optimize
2010-04-26 21:33 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
@ 2010-04-26 21:49 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-04-27 5:47 ` Keir Fraser
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pasi Kärkkäinen @ 2010-04-26 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keir Fraser; +Cc: qiushanggao, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:33:27AM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 09:52:43PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> > On 26/04/2010 21:07, "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@iki.fi> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:05:43PM +0800, qiushanggao wrote:
> > >> I find the question: inter-domain event only can be send to domain's
> > >> vcpu0 in Xen, so that dom0's vcpu0 deal with the all domU's network and
> > >> disk request; but my computer have 8 physical cpu;
> > >>
> > >> anybody find the question? and anybody tell me how to optimize the
> > >> question?
> > >
> > > Maybe Keir can comment on this one..
> >
> > It's not true. An event can be delivered to any dom0 vcpu. They are
> > presented as a type of irq to the dom0 kernel, and hence normal Linux
> > load-balancing strategies such as irqbalanced will apply.
> >
>
> I think he meant domUs and dom0.. does the same apply to domUs?
>
+not
-- Pasi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Event channel performance optimize
2010-04-26 21:33 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-04-26 21:49 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
@ 2010-04-27 5:47 ` Keir Fraser
2010-05-08 14:08 ` 答复: [Xen-devel] " qiushanggao
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Keir Fraser @ 2010-04-27 5:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pasi Kärkkäinen; +Cc: qiushanggao, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
On 26/04/2010 22:33, "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@iki.fi> wrote:
>> It's not true. An event can be delivered to any dom0 vcpu. They are
>> presented as a type of irq to the dom0 kernel, and hence normal Linux
>> load-balancing strategies such as irqbalanced will apply.
>>
>
> I think he meant domUs and dom0.. does the same apply to domUs?
The limitation to vcpu0 applies only to HVM domUs.
-- Keir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* 答复: [Xen-devel] Event channel performance optimize
2010-04-27 5:47 ` Keir Fraser
@ 2010-05-08 14:08 ` qiushanggao
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: qiushanggao @ 2010-05-08 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Keir Fraser', 'Pasi Kärkkäinen'; +Cc: xen-devel
I test it last week, and I find your right;
Thanks Keir;
--Samgao
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com]
发送时间: 2010年4月27日 13:48
收件人: Pasi Kärkkäinen
抄送: qiushanggao; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
主题: Re: [Xen-devel] Event channel performance optimize
On 26/04/2010 22:33, "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@iki.fi> wrote:
>> It's not true. An event can be delivered to any dom0 vcpu. They are
>> presented as a type of irq to the dom0 kernel, and hence normal Linux
>> load-balancing strategies such as irqbalanced will apply.
>>
>
> I think he meant domUs and dom0.. does the same apply to domUs?
The limitation to vcpu0 applies only to HVM domUs.
-- Keir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-08 14:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-04-23 15:05 Event channel performance optimize qiushanggao
2010-04-26 20:07 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-04-26 20:52 ` Keir Fraser
2010-04-26 21:33 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-04-26 21:49 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-04-27 5:47 ` Keir Fraser
2010-05-08 14:08 ` 答复: [Xen-devel] " qiushanggao
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).