From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "AP Xen" Subject: RE: New feature support - xl or xm ? Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:02:13 -0700 Message-ID: <001201cb08d7$d2caad80$78600880$@com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-us List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: 'Stefano Stabellini' , "'Vincent, Pradeep'" Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, 'Ian Jackson' , 'Dulloor' List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > We like the 'xm' CLI, in fact we are trying our best to provide a > compatible command line interface with 'xl'. > Ideally you'll be able to symlink xl to xm and everything will still > work. If you find any problem with command line incompatibilities > please let us know, and we'll fix them. > > On the other hand if you are speaking about the XML-RPC interface > provided by xend, that is a totally different matter. So with xl, xend doesn't need to be running as it uses the libxl API which bypasses libxenguest/xend? Thanks, AP