From: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
To: Kevin Stange <kevin@steadfast.net>
Cc: Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: PCI Device Subtree Change from Traditional to Upstream
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 13:26:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <017beab01afb490bba6c8c42040c341b@AMSPEX02CL03.citrite.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180104125217.GB1905@perard.uk.xensource.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org] On Behalf
> Of Anthony PERARD
> Sent: 04 January 2018 12:52
> To: Kevin Stange <kevin@steadfast.net>
> Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@citrix.com>; xen-
> devel@lists.xenproject.org
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] PCI Device Subtree Change from Traditional to
> Upstream
>
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 05:10:54PM -0600, Kevin Stange wrote:
> > On 01/03/2018 11:57 AM, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 11:40:03AM -0600, Kevin Stange wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I've been working on transitioning a number of Windows guests under
> HVM
> > >> from using QEMU traditional to QEMU upstream as is recommended in
> the
> > >> documentation. When I move these guests, the PCI subtree for Xen
> > >> devices changes and Windows creates a totally new copy of each
> device.
> > >> Windows tracks down the storage without issue, but it treats the new
> > >> instance of the NIC driver as a new device and clears the network
> > >> configuration even though the MAC address is unchanged. Manually
> > >> booting the guest back on the traditional device model reactivates the
> > >> original PCI subtree and the old network configuration with it.
> > >>
> > >> The only thing that I have been able to find that's substantially
> > >> different comparing the device trees is that the device instance ID
> > >> values differ on the parent Xen PCI device:
> > >>
> > >>
> PCI\VEN_5853&DEV_0001&SUBSYS_00015853&REV_01\3&267A616A&3&18
> > >>
> > >>
> PCI\VEN_5853&DEV_0001&SUBSYS_00015853&REV_01\3&267A616A&3&10
> > >>
> > >> Besides actually setting the guest to boot using QEMU traditional, is
> > >> there a way to convince Windows to treat these devices as the same? A
> > >> patch-based solution would be acceptable to me if there is one, but I
> > >> don't understand the code well enough to create my own solution.
Kevin,
I missed the original email as it went past...
Are Xen Project PV drivers installed in the guest? And are you talking about a PV NIC device or an emulated device?
Paul
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-04 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-20 17:40 PCI Device Subtree Change from Traditional to Upstream Kevin Stange
2017-12-20 17:44 ` George Dunlap
2018-01-03 17:57 ` Anthony PERARD
2018-01-03 23:10 ` Kevin Stange
2018-01-04 12:52 ` Anthony PERARD
2018-01-04 13:26 ` Paul Durrant [this message]
2018-01-04 21:17 ` Kevin Stange
2018-01-05 9:03 ` Paul Durrant
2018-01-05 17:05 ` Kevin Stange
2018-01-04 21:16 ` Kevin Stange
2018-01-05 17:10 ` Kevin Stange
2018-01-05 20:56 ` Kevin Stange
2018-01-25 17:54 ` George Dunlap
2018-01-25 18:04 ` Anthony PERARD
2018-01-25 18:14 ` George Dunlap
2018-01-26 10:38 ` Paul Durrant
2019-04-08 9:46 ` George Dunlap
2019-04-08 9:46 ` [Xen-devel] " George Dunlap
2019-04-08 9:51 ` Paul Durrant
2019-04-08 9:51 ` [Xen-devel] " Paul Durrant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=017beab01afb490bba6c8c42040c341b@AMSPEX02CL03.citrite.net \
--to=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
--cc=kevin@steadfast.net \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).