From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: jeremy@goop.org, Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: vsyscalls may be going away... impact on Xen time performance on Linux in the future?
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:55:16 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <070733f8-c7aa-4543-85dd-d353088b0e20@default> (raw)
Hmmm...
It appears that Xen time mechanisms that use vsyscall may be
getting slower...
"This is a significant performance penalty (~220ns here) for
all vsyscall users, but there aren't many left."
http://lwn.net/Articles/446220/
I honestly don't remember all the details myself anymore,
but I think this means that user apps in Xen PV domains
that call gettimeofday a *lot* may be in for a bit of
a shock when they move to a 3.x kernel in the future.
(Many enterprise apps do things like timestamp transactions,
which can lead to 10s of thousands of gettimeofday's
per second.)
See the xen-devel discussion here:
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-10/msg00872.html
Dan
P.S. For lwn subscribers (or non-subscribers willing to wait a week),
see Jonathan Corbet's nice overview at http://lwn.net/Articles/446125/
--
Thanks... for the memory!
I really could use more / my throughput's on the floor
The balloon is flat / my swap disk's fat / I've OOM's in store
Overcommitted so much
(with apologies to Bob Hope)
next reply other threads:[~2011-06-09 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-09 21:55 Dan Magenheimer [this message]
2011-06-09 22:08 ` vsyscalls may be going away... impact on Xen time performance on Linux in the future? Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-06-09 22:39 ` Dan Magenheimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=070733f8-c7aa-4543-85dd-d353088b0e20@default \
--to=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).