* Question on xenpm
@ 2010-07-05 9:09 Carsten Schiers
2010-07-05 11:05 ` AW: " Carsten Schiers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Schiers @ 2010-07-05 9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
Dear all,
after having upgraded my server from AMD 4050e to X4 640, I now use cpufreq=xen and had
to adapt a munin script (monitoring tool) to display the residency in the different P-states.
This script uses /sys/device/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq to read out the information, whereas
I now use xenpm get-cpufreq-state.
Before I noticed that the CPU is in highest possible P-state (lowest frequences) nearly all
of the time, and a minimal percentage in the lowest. Now I can see a 50/50 distribution.
Interesting enough, the xenpm get-cpuidle-state will show that the CPUs are at aprox. 90%
in C1 idle state.
Can there be a difference in how the two methods to collect the info are working? I mean
something like xenpm will not count residency when in C1, but cpufreq driver will normaly
do?
BR,
Carsten.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* AW: Question on xenpm
2010-07-05 9:09 Question on xenpm Carsten Schiers
@ 2010-07-05 11:05 ` Carsten Schiers
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Schiers @ 2010-07-05 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
Just a short addon-question, xenpm get-cpufreq-para will currently leave
the scaling driver blank. How can I make sure that the powernow driver is
used?
Thanks,
Carsten.
----- Originalnachricht -----
Von: Carsten Schiers <carsten@schiers.de>
Gesendet: Mon, 5.7.2010 11:09
An: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Betreff: [Xen-devel] Question on xenpm
Dear all,
after having upgraded my server from AMD 4050e to X4 640, I now use cpufreq=xen and had
to adapt a munin script (monitoring tool) to display the residency in the different P-states.
This script uses /sys/device/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq to read out the information, whereas
I now use xenpm get-cpufreq-state.
Before I noticed that the CPU is in highest possible P-state (lowest frequences) nearly all
of the time, and a minimal percentage in the lowest. Now I can see a 50/50 distribution.
Interesting enough, the xenpm get-cpuidle-state will show that the CPUs are at aprox. 90%
in C1 idle state.
Can there be a difference in how the two methods to collect the info are working? I mean
something like xenpm will not count residency when in C1, but cpufreq driver will normaly
do?
BR,
Carsten.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-07-05 11:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-07-05 9:09 Question on xenpm Carsten Schiers
2010-07-05 11:05 ` AW: " Carsten Schiers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).