From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: Re: Second release candidate for Xen 4.0.0 Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 22:47:52 +0000 Message-ID: <1265237272.18563.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <87hbpygny4.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu> <87vdeear2h.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87vdeear2h.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ferenc Wagner Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 22:32 +0000, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Btw. is it intentional that the kernel configuration phase is > interactive? After make world, I've got to answer the following > questions: The pvops kernel build integration into xen-unstable.hg uses the upstream kernel's defconfig (which may not always be complete to start with) tweaked to enable Xen. If new config options have been added then they need to be added to xen-unstable.hg/buildconfigs/enable-xen-config Ian.