xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com>
To: Weidong Han <weidong.han@intel.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Noboru Iwamatsu <n_iwamatsu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	"Cihula, Joseph" <joseph.cihula@intel.com>,
	"Kay, Allen M" <allen.m.kay@intel.com>,
	"linux@eikelenboom.it" <linux@eikelenboom.it>,
	"keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com" <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:32:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1268274721.3015.64.camel@2710p.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B985150.1000001@intel.com>

On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 10:11 +0800, Weidong Han wrote:
   
> Alex, you are right. IOAPICs can be included in any DRHDs. Pls try 
> following patch, if no problem, I will submit it.

Thanks Weidong.  This of course works, but I still get this output:

(XEN) IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 8, version 32, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-23
(XEN) IOAPIC[1]: apic_id 0, version 32, address 0xfec08000, GSI 24-47
(XEN) IOAPIC[2]: apic_id 10, version 32, address 0xfec10000, GSI 48-71
(XEN) Enabling APIC mode:  Phys.  Using 3 I/O APICs
(XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:421:   Non-existent device (84:13.0) is reported in this DRHD's scope!
(XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:442:   There are devices under device scope are not PCI discoverable! if xen fails at VT-d enabling, pls try option iommu=workaround_bios_bug.

So now we've effectively relegated this code to printing things that
look like errors for both actual bad DMAR tables and 100% spec compliant
tables.  At a minimum, I think these dprintks need to be reduce to info
or debug level since they're effectively just spewing out noise.  Can't
we put a tag for the device type in the list of scope devices and skip
checking discoverable PCI devices for IOAPICs?  Do we need to do the
same for HPETs?  Thanks,

Alex


> diff -r cadf1bae9ee2 xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c    Thu Feb 25 18:26:45 2010 +0800
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c    Thu Mar 11 17:49:40 2010 +0800
> @@ -437,11 +437,9 @@ acpi_parse_one_drhd(struct acpi_dmar_ent
>              else
>              {
>                  dprintk(XENLOG_WARNING VTDPREFIX,
> -                    "  The DRHD is invalid due to there are devices under "
> -                    "its scope are not PCI discoverable! Pls try option "
> -                    "iommu=force or iommu=workaround_bios_bug if you "
> -                    "really want VT-d\n");
> -                ret = -EINVAL;
> +                    "  There are devices under device scope are not PCI "
> +                    "discoverable! if xen fails at VT-d enabling, pls try "
> +                    "option iommu=workaround_bios_bug.\n");
>              }
>          }
>          else
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-11  2:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-21  2:46 [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking Han, Weidong
2010-01-21  8:25 ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-01-21  8:38   ` Han, Weidong
2010-01-21 10:03     ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-01-21 10:08       ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-01-21 10:19         ` Weidong Han
2010-01-21 10:27           ` Keir Fraser
2010-01-21 10:49             ` Weidong Han
2010-01-21 12:19               ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-01-21 12:46                 ` Weidong Han
2010-01-21 14:01                   ` Keir Fraser
2010-01-21 14:17                   ` Sander Eikelenboom
2010-01-21 14:33                     ` Keir Fraser
2010-01-22  2:12                       ` Weidong Han
2010-01-22  2:38                         ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-01-22  2:53                           ` Weidong Han
2010-01-22  3:16                             ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-01-22  8:47                               ` Weidong Han
2010-01-22  9:19                                 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2010-01-22 12:15                                   ` Weidong Han
2010-01-22 12:32                                     ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-01-23 12:40                                       ` Weidong Han
2010-01-23 13:08                                         ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-01-23 14:33                                           ` Sander Eikelenboom
2010-01-23 14:54                                             ` [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, documenting boot options Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-01-25 16:40                                               ` Stephen Spector
2010-01-25 16:58                                                 ` Documentation Xen-hypervisor and Dom0 xen-related boot options (was Re: [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, documenting boot options) Sander Eikelenboom
2010-01-25 20:56                                                   ` Stephen Spector
2010-01-27 11:33                                                     ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-01-25  7:06                                 ` [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-01-25  7:56                                   ` Weidong Han
2010-01-25  9:02                                     ` Sander Eikelenboom
2010-01-25  9:11                                       ` Weidong Han
2010-01-25  9:22                                     ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-01-25 10:08                                       ` Weidong Han
2010-01-25 10:45                                         ` Sander Eikelenboom
2010-01-25 13:43                                           ` Keir Fraser
2010-01-25 13:57                                             ` Christian Tramnitz
2010-01-25 14:10                                             ` Weidong Han
2010-01-26  1:16                                               ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-01-26  5:51                                                 ` Weidong Han
2010-01-26  6:38                                                   ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-01-26  6:42                                                     ` Weidong Han
2010-01-25 14:12                                             ` Weidong Han
2010-01-25 14:13                                             ` Han, Weidong
2010-03-09 21:39                                 ` Alex Williamson
2010-03-09 21:30                                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-03-09 21:57                                     ` Alex Williamson
2010-03-09 22:22                                       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-03-09 23:05                                         ` Alex Williamson
2010-03-09 23:25                                           ` Alex Williamson
2010-03-10  2:13                                             ` Alex Williamson
2010-03-10  2:40                                   ` Weidong Han
2010-03-10  3:18                                     ` Alex Williamson
2010-03-10  3:28                                       ` Weidong Han
2010-03-10  3:37                                         ` Alex Williamson
2010-03-10  4:25                                           ` Weidong Han
2010-03-10  4:47                                             ` Alex Williamson
2010-03-10  7:03                                               ` Weidong Han
2010-03-10 13:56                                                 ` Alex Williamson
2010-03-10 18:06                                                   ` Alex Williamson
2010-03-11  2:11                                                     ` Weidong Han
2010-03-11  2:32                                                       ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2010-03-11  3:44                                                         ` Weidong Han
2010-03-11  4:52                                                           ` Alex Williamson
2010-03-11  8:30                                                             ` Weidong Han
2010-01-21 15:28                     ` Andrew Lyon
2010-01-21 15:04                 ` Keir Fraser
2010-01-22  1:35                   ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-01-21 10:13       ` Weidong Han
2010-01-21 12:09         ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-01-21 12:38           ` Weidong Han
2010-01-22  0:23             ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-01-21  8:45   ` Andrew Lyon
2010-01-21 10:03     ` Weidong Han
2010-01-21  9:15   ` Keir Fraser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1268274721.3015.64.camel@2710p.home \
    --to=alex.williamson@hp.com \
    --cc=allen.m.kay@intel.com \
    --cc=joseph.cihula@intel.com \
    --cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=linux@eikelenboom.it \
    --cc=n_iwamatsu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=weidong.han@intel.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).