From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com>
To: Weidong Han <weidong.han@intel.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Noboru Iwamatsu <n_iwamatsu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"Cihula, Joseph" <joseph.cihula@intel.com>,
"Kay, Allen M" <allen.m.kay@intel.com>,
"linux@eikelenboom.it" <linux@eikelenboom.it>,
"keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com" <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:32:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1268274721.3015.64.camel@2710p.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B985150.1000001@intel.com>
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 10:11 +0800, Weidong Han wrote:
> Alex, you are right. IOAPICs can be included in any DRHDs. Pls try
> following patch, if no problem, I will submit it.
Thanks Weidong. This of course works, but I still get this output:
(XEN) IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 8, version 32, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-23
(XEN) IOAPIC[1]: apic_id 0, version 32, address 0xfec08000, GSI 24-47
(XEN) IOAPIC[2]: apic_id 10, version 32, address 0xfec10000, GSI 48-71
(XEN) Enabling APIC mode: Phys. Using 3 I/O APICs
(XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:421: Non-existent device (84:13.0) is reported in this DRHD's scope!
(XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:442: There are devices under device scope are not PCI discoverable! if xen fails at VT-d enabling, pls try option iommu=workaround_bios_bug.
So now we've effectively relegated this code to printing things that
look like errors for both actual bad DMAR tables and 100% spec compliant
tables. At a minimum, I think these dprintks need to be reduce to info
or debug level since they're effectively just spewing out noise. Can't
we put a tag for the device type in the list of scope devices and skip
checking discoverable PCI devices for IOAPICs? Do we need to do the
same for HPETs? Thanks,
Alex
> diff -r cadf1bae9ee2 xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c Thu Feb 25 18:26:45 2010 +0800
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c Thu Mar 11 17:49:40 2010 +0800
> @@ -437,11 +437,9 @@ acpi_parse_one_drhd(struct acpi_dmar_ent
> else
> {
> dprintk(XENLOG_WARNING VTDPREFIX,
> - " The DRHD is invalid due to there are devices under "
> - "its scope are not PCI discoverable! Pls try option "
> - "iommu=force or iommu=workaround_bios_bug if you "
> - "really want VT-d\n");
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> + " There are devices under device scope are not PCI "
> + "discoverable! if xen fails at VT-d enabling, pls try "
> + "option iommu=workaround_bios_bug.\n");
> }
> }
> else
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-11 2:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-21 2:46 [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking Han, Weidong
2010-01-21 8:25 ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-01-21 8:38 ` Han, Weidong
2010-01-21 10:03 ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-01-21 10:08 ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-01-21 10:19 ` Weidong Han
2010-01-21 10:27 ` Keir Fraser
2010-01-21 10:49 ` Weidong Han
2010-01-21 12:19 ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-01-21 12:46 ` Weidong Han
2010-01-21 14:01 ` Keir Fraser
2010-01-21 14:17 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2010-01-21 14:33 ` Keir Fraser
2010-01-22 2:12 ` Weidong Han
2010-01-22 2:38 ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-01-22 2:53 ` Weidong Han
2010-01-22 3:16 ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-01-22 8:47 ` Weidong Han
2010-01-22 9:19 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2010-01-22 12:15 ` Weidong Han
2010-01-22 12:32 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-01-23 12:40 ` Weidong Han
2010-01-23 13:08 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-01-23 14:33 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2010-01-23 14:54 ` [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, documenting boot options Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-01-25 16:40 ` Stephen Spector
2010-01-25 16:58 ` Documentation Xen-hypervisor and Dom0 xen-related boot options (was Re: [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, documenting boot options) Sander Eikelenboom
2010-01-25 20:56 ` Stephen Spector
2010-01-27 11:33 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-01-25 7:06 ` [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-01-25 7:56 ` Weidong Han
2010-01-25 9:02 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2010-01-25 9:11 ` Weidong Han
2010-01-25 9:22 ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-01-25 10:08 ` Weidong Han
2010-01-25 10:45 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2010-01-25 13:43 ` Keir Fraser
2010-01-25 13:57 ` Christian Tramnitz
2010-01-25 14:10 ` Weidong Han
2010-01-26 1:16 ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-01-26 5:51 ` Weidong Han
2010-01-26 6:38 ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-01-26 6:42 ` Weidong Han
2010-01-25 14:12 ` Weidong Han
2010-01-25 14:13 ` Han, Weidong
2010-03-09 21:39 ` Alex Williamson
2010-03-09 21:30 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-03-09 21:57 ` Alex Williamson
2010-03-09 22:22 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-03-09 23:05 ` Alex Williamson
2010-03-09 23:25 ` Alex Williamson
2010-03-10 2:13 ` Alex Williamson
2010-03-10 2:40 ` Weidong Han
2010-03-10 3:18 ` Alex Williamson
2010-03-10 3:28 ` Weidong Han
2010-03-10 3:37 ` Alex Williamson
2010-03-10 4:25 ` Weidong Han
2010-03-10 4:47 ` Alex Williamson
2010-03-10 7:03 ` Weidong Han
2010-03-10 13:56 ` Alex Williamson
2010-03-10 18:06 ` Alex Williamson
2010-03-11 2:11 ` Weidong Han
2010-03-11 2:32 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2010-03-11 3:44 ` Weidong Han
2010-03-11 4:52 ` Alex Williamson
2010-03-11 8:30 ` Weidong Han
2010-01-21 15:28 ` Andrew Lyon
2010-01-21 15:04 ` Keir Fraser
2010-01-22 1:35 ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-01-21 10:13 ` Weidong Han
2010-01-21 12:09 ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-01-21 12:38 ` Weidong Han
2010-01-22 0:23 ` Noboru Iwamatsu
2010-01-21 8:45 ` Andrew Lyon
2010-01-21 10:03 ` Weidong Han
2010-01-21 9:15 ` Keir Fraser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1268274721.3015.64.camel@2710p.home \
--to=alex.williamson@hp.com \
--cc=allen.m.kay@intel.com \
--cc=joseph.cihula@intel.com \
--cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=linux@eikelenboom.it \
--cc=n_iwamatsu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=weidong.han@intel.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).