From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: xm list vs. xl list: more differences? Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 08:15:52 +0100 Message-ID: <1280733352.29620.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Dan Magenheimer Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Sun, 2010-08-01 at 17:07 +0100, Dan Magenheimer wrote: > I see that "xl list" shows a domain waiting idly for console > input as "r", whereas "xm list" shows the same domain as "b". > I also see that the State field for "xl list" contains only > three characters (e.g. "r--"), whereas "xm list" shows six > (e.g. "-b----"). > > Is this expected/intended (e.g. "r" in xm list means "running" > and in xl list it means "runnable:), or is it a bug? Take a look at this commit in xen-unstable.hg, I think it makes "xl list" and "xm list" the same: changeset: 21849:1c1b02487b57 user: Ian Campbell date: Fri Jul 23 17:39:32 2010 +0100 summary: libxl/xl: correctly report domain state. Ian.