xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: credit2's csched_init() registering of a CPU notifier
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:30:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1300462205.7041.79.camel@elijah> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D835D4F02000078000373CA@vpn.id2.novell.com>

csched_alloc_pdata() only calls init_pcpu() for cpu 0.

The problem here is that we have a dependency loop.  credit2 (at the
moment) wants to have one runqueue per socket.  However, at the time the
first csched_alloc_pdata() is called, the cpu topology information is
not yet available.  So for all cpus except cpu 0, we register a cpu
callback notifier, so that we can call init_pcpu() when the cpu is up
(at which point the topology information for that cpu is known).

Cpu 0 never gets a callback; so we special-case csched_alloc_pdata() to
call init_pcpu() for cpu 0, and to always assign cpu 0 to runqueue 0.

I know that this is almost certainly incredibly broken WRT cpu pools at
the moment.  I will fix it, but ATM it's just not a priority.

 -George 

On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 12:25 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 18.03.11 at 10:24, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:
> > George,
> > 
> > as ->init() can be called more than once (for CPU pools) it seems
> > wrong to do any global initialization in ->init(). The question is
> > whether it's worth adding a ->global_init(), or whether instead
> > a callout from the notifier schedule.c sets up wouldn't be a
> > better mechanism (though that would require maintaining a list
> > of scheduler instances).
> 
> Just moving this onto a global_init doesn't work (crashes), and
> looking at what the notifier handler does I wonder why it's
> needed at all - csched_alloc_pdata() also calls init_pcpu(), and
> that ought to be the canonical way. Plus there's also this
> somewhat frightening comment "Hope this is safe from cpupools
> switching things around. :-)" in csched_cpu_starting().
> Minimally I think there needs to be a check that *ops really is
> credit2's.
> 
> Jan
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2011-03-18 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-18  9:24 credit2's csched_init() registering of a CPU notifier Jan Beulich
2011-03-18 12:25 ` Jan Beulich
2011-03-18 15:30   ` George Dunlap [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1300462205.7041.79.camel@elijah \
    --to=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).