From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
To: hotmaim <tinnycloud@hotmail.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: A question of grant table version
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 09:43:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1302338601.10419.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BLU0-SMTP117A7A1DBE55736C2667910DAA60@phx.gbl>
On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 02:28 +0100, hotmaim wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a question on grant table version.
> In 2.6.31 pvops kernel, there is a gnttab_request_version to request using version 2.
> But this cannot be found in 2.6.3236 pvops kernel, that is it uses version 1.
>
> So, the fact is newer kernel use older grant table version, it doesn,t make sense to me.
> Could someone comfirm it is on purpose?
Unless you specifically need the new functionality of grant table v2
(transitive grants or sub page grants) there is no difference/benefit
between v1 and v2.
The only user of that new functionality was netchannel2, which has not
been carried forward from 2.6.31 and hence current kernels still use v1
grant tables with no loss of functionality.
People are working on introducing the interesting features of
netchannel2 as protocol extensions to netchannel1 and it is likely that
this will also involve reintroducing the use of grant table v2 in newer
kernels.
Ian.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-09 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <COL0-MC3-F306QBkCaJ000a785c@col0-mc3-f30.Col0.hotmail.com>
2011-04-09 1:28 ` A question of grant table version hotmaim
2011-04-09 3:35 ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-04-09 3:37 ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-04-09 8:43 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1302338601.10419.12.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=tinnycloud@hotmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).