From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@eu.citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
"keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com" <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 3 of 4] libxl: Add support for passing in the machine's E820 for PCI passthrough in libxl_device_pci_parse_bdf
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:29:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1302636582.5528.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110412190040.GA23249@dumpdata.com>
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 20:00 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 07:44:48PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 18:53 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 01:19:43PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 22:35 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The code libxl_device_pci_parse_bdf calls the libxl__e820_alloc when
> > > > > it has parsed one BDF. Subsequent calls to libxl_device_pci_parse_bdf
> > > > > will
> > > > > not trigger libxl__e820_alloc being called (unless the first call to
> > > > > libxl__e820_alloc failed).
> > > >
> > > > That sounds like a very odd non-intuitive location for that allocation.
> > > > Why not do it in libxl_domain_create or somewhere like that?
> > > >
> > > > I think the e820 map added to the idl should become a simple boolean
> > > > flag and this should all be taken care of internally based on that.
> > >
> > > Like this?
> >
> > Why no_machine_e820 instead of just machine_e820? You can set a non-zero
> > default in the appropriate libxl_foo_init function if need be.
>
> I tried to
> ("machine_e820", bool, True, "Use machine's E820 for PCI passthrough."),
>
> and it made the the machine_e820 variable be an 'const bool' so that you couldn't
> change it anymore.
The "True" in the above is the const-ness, not the initial value.
You want:
("machine_e820", bool, False, "Use machine's E820 for PCI passthrough."),
+ the appropriate initialisation in libxl_init_build_info.
Ian.
>
> xl_cmdimpl.c:990: error: assignment of read-only member ‘machine_e820’
>
> 112 char * cmdline;
> 113 libxl_file_reference ramdisk;
> 114 const char * features;
> 115 /*
> 116 * Use machine's E820 for PCI passthrough.
> 117 */
> 118 const bool machine_e820;
> 119 } pv;
> 120 } u;
> 121 } libxl_domain_build_info;
>
> If I make an 'integer' I get the same thing. Ah, if I modify the python code:
> konrad@phenom:~/hg/xen-unstable.hg/tools/libxl$ hg diff
> diff -r cc01692f4b41 tools/libxl/gentypes.py
> --- a/tools/libxl/gentypes.py Tue Apr 12 14:46:05 2011 -0400
> +++ b/tools/libxl/gentypes.py Tue Apr 12 14:58:24 2011 -0400
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ def libxl_C_type_define(ty, indent = "")
> s += format_comment(4, f.comment)
> x = libxl_C_instance_of(f.type, f.name)
> if f.const:
> - x = "const " + x
> + x = " " + x
> x = x.replace("\n", "\n ")
> s += " " + x + ";\n"
> if ty.typename is None:
>
> It starts working, but that does not look like the correct fix.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-12 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-11 21:35 [PATCH 0 of 4] Patches for PCI passthrough with modified E820 (v2) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-04-11 21:35 ` [PATCH 1 of 4] tools: Add xc_domain_set_memory_map and xc_get_machine_memory_map calls (x86, amd64 only) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-04-11 21:35 ` [PATCH 2 of 4] x86: make the pv-only e820 array be dynamic Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-04-12 12:32 ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-12 12:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-04-12 13:06 ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-12 17:21 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-04-13 7:34 ` Jan Beulich
2011-04-13 13:31 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-04-13 8:46 ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-13 13:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-04-11 21:35 ` [PATCH 3 of 4] libxl: Add support for passing in the machine's E820 for PCI passthrough in libxl_device_pci_parse_bdf Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-04-12 12:19 ` Ian Campbell
2011-04-12 17:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-04-12 18:44 ` Ian Campbell
2011-04-12 19:00 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-04-12 19:29 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2011-04-11 21:35 ` [PATCH 4 of 4] libxl: Convert E820_UNUSABLE and E820_RAM to E820_UNUSABLE as appropriate Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1302636582.5528.25.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ian.campbell@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Tim.Deegan@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).