Re: Proposal: vif-local [and 1 more messages]

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com>]

On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 18:31 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> W. Michael Petullo writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Re: New 4.0.2 and 4.1.1 release candidates"):
> > Is it too late to merge the patch discussed at
> >   http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2011-05/msg00306.html
> 
> We don't generally apply patches directly to the stable trees (4.0 and
> 4.1, at the moment).  We like them to come through xen-unstable first.
> 
> When you submitted your patch, you got this reply:
> 
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Proposal: vif-local"):
> > On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 18:10 +0100, W. Michael Petullo wrote:
> > > Allow for site-specific hooks that will be executed after Xen initializes
> > > a vif. This allows an administrator to specify custom firewall rules or
> > > other special configuration parameters.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: W. Michael Petullo <mike@flyn.org>
> > 
> > This is against 4.1? can you check that it applies to xen-unstable.hg
> > please, other than that:
> > 
> > Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> 
> Can you confirm that your patch applies and works correctly against
> xen-unstable.hg ?

Michael replied to this mail in <20110510160631.GA17482@imp.local>:

> I pulled xen-unstable.hg from Mercurial and the patch applied cleanly.
> The modified scripts were identical to those resulting from applying
> the patch against 4.1.0.

Ian.