From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: Proposal: vif-local [and 1 more messages] Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 18:51:21 +0100 Message-ID: <1306259481.7348.1.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> References: <20110524141709.GA2140@imp.local> <20110505171542.GA17115@imp.local> <1304671321.26692.117.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <20110506170602.GA4198@imp.local> <1304930722.26692.196.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <20110509171011.GA15962@imp.local> <1305014526.26692.238.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <19931.60302.515178.887806@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <19931.60302.515178.887806@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Jackson Cc: Keir Fraser , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "W. Michael Petullo" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 18:31 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > W. Michael Petullo writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Re: New 4.0.2 and 4.1.1 release candidates"): > > Is it too late to merge the patch discussed at > > http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2011-05/msg00306.html > > We don't generally apply patches directly to the stable trees (4.0 and > 4.1, at the moment). We like them to come through xen-unstable first. > > When you submitted your patch, you got this reply: > > Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Proposal: vif-local"): > > On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 18:10 +0100, W. Michael Petullo wrote: > > > Allow for site-specific hooks that will be executed after Xen initializes > > > a vif. This allows an administrator to specify custom firewall rules or > > > other special configuration parameters. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: W. Michael Petullo > > > > This is against 4.1? can you check that it applies to xen-unstable.hg > > please, other than that: > > > > Acked-by: Ian Campbell > > Can you confirm that your patch applies and works correctly against > xen-unstable.hg ? Michael replied to this mail in <20110510160631.GA17482@imp.local>: > I pulled xen-unstable.hg from Mercurial and the patch applied cleanly. > The modified scripts were identical to those resulting from applying > the patch against 4.1.0. Ian.