Re: AW: Re: [PATCH 1 of 2] xl: improve compatibility with xm

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com>]

On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 07:43 +0100, Carsten Schiers wrote:
> Sorry folks, I tried to resent, but then, I saw that I was only in CC of 
> the mail, so I did not do anything wrong ?!? BR, C.

IanJ's original comment about word wrapping was To: you so I think
resending was the right thing to do. The Cc: you got below is Stefano's
response to IanJ's mail, it was aimed at you but To: Ian only because
that's what the Reply button does.

(BTW, just curious, what does "BR" mean?)

Ian.

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Stefano Stabellini [mailto:stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com] 
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Juni 2011 18:46
> An: Ian Jackson
> Cc: Ian Campbell; xen-devel; Carsten Schiers; Stefano Stabellini
> Betreff: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1 of 2] xl: improve compatibility with 
> xm
> 
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Carsten Schiers writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH 1 of 2] xl: improve 
> compatibility with xm"):
> > > -    printf("\t(domain_build_info)\n");
> > > +    printf("\t(build_info)\n");
> > ...
> > >          printf("\t\t\t(backend_domid %d)\n", 
> > > d_config->disks[i].backend_domid);
> > 
> > This patch has been wordwrapped by your mailer.  Can you please
> > arrange for it not to be ?
> 
> see Documentation/email-clients.txt under the Linux tree
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
>