From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: AW: Re: [PATCH 1 of 2] xl: improve compatibility with xm Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 07:55:01 +0100 Message-ID: <1307084101.4153.13.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Carsten Schiers Cc: xen-devel , Ian Jackson , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 07:43 +0100, Carsten Schiers wrote: > Sorry folks, I tried to resent, but then, I saw that I was only in CC of > the mail, so I did not do anything wrong ?!? BR, C. IanJ's original comment about word wrapping was To: you so I think resending was the right thing to do. The Cc: you got below is Stefano's response to IanJ's mail, it was aimed at you but To: Ian only because that's what the Reply button does. (BTW, just curious, what does "BR" mean?) Ian. > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Stefano Stabellini [mailto:stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Juni 2011 18:46 > An: Ian Jackson > Cc: Ian Campbell; xen-devel; Carsten Schiers; Stefano Stabellini > Betreff: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1 of 2] xl: improve compatibility with > xm > > On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Carsten Schiers writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH 1 of 2] xl: improve > compatibility with xm"): > > > - printf("\t(domain_build_info)\n"); > > > + printf("\t(build_info)\n"); > > ... > > > printf("\t\t\t(backend_domid %d)\n", > > > d_config->disks[i].backend_domid); > > > > This patch has been wordwrapped by your mailer. Can you please > > arrange for it not to be ? > > see Documentation/email-clients.txt under the Linux tree > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > >