From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wei Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH] libxl: enabling upstream qemu as pure pv backend. Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 18:20:59 +0800 Message-ID: <1307528459.31359.43.camel@limbo> References: <1307503152.31359.2.camel@limbo> <1307523318.775.703.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1307523318.775.703.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Campbell Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 09:55 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > One general concern I have is there are cases where we want 2 DM > instances. In particular we can have an FV instance running in a stub > domain which uses a PV instance running in dom0 for certain > functionality (e.g. emulated VGA in the FV stub domain qemu goes to an > xenfb frontend talking to a xenfb backend running in a PV qemu in domain > 0). > Ah, I misunderstood you at first. This use case is a bit complicated. I still wonder if libxl supports this kind of configuration... TBH, I'm not familiar with stubdom.