From: Daniel Stodden <daniel.stodden@citrix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: "Vincent, Pradeep" <pradeepv@amazon.com>,
Xen <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/blkback: Don't let in-flight requests defer pending ones.
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:42:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1309200148.24771.13.camel@agari.van.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110627140339.GE6978@dumpdata.com>
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 10:03 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > In the case at hand, increasing the ring size was way more productive.
> > At which point the queue depth multiplies as well. And I currently
> > expect that the longer it gets the more urgent the issue you describe
> > will be.
>
> You wouldn't have patches for that somewhere tucked away? I am going over
> the patches for 3.1 xen-blkback and was thinking to have them all queued up and
> test them all at once..
I was going to send the kernel patch right after, just to discover that
xen-blkback lacks some of the synchronization items the original one was
based on. It's coming, but it's rather going to be a series.
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-27 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-02 7:04 [PATCH] blkback: Fix block I/O latency issue Vincent, Pradeep
2011-05-02 8:13 ` Jan Beulich
2011-05-03 1:10 ` Vincent, Pradeep
2011-05-03 14:55 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-03 17:16 ` Vincent, Pradeep
2011-05-03 17:51 ` Daniel Stodden
2011-05-03 23:41 ` Vincent, Pradeep
2011-05-03 17:52 ` Daniel Stodden
2011-05-04 1:54 ` Vincent, Pradeep
2011-05-09 20:24 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-13 0:40 ` Vincent, Pradeep
2011-05-13 2:51 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-16 15:22 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-20 6:12 ` Vincent, Pradeep
2011-05-24 16:02 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-24 22:40 ` Vincent, Pradeep
2011-05-28 20:12 ` [RE-PATCH] " Daniel Stodden
2011-05-28 20:21 ` [PATCH] xen/blkback: Don't let in-flight requests defer pending ones Daniel Stodden
2011-05-29 8:09 ` Vincent, Pradeep
2011-05-29 11:34 ` Daniel Stodden
2011-06-01 8:02 ` Vincent, Pradeep
2011-06-01 8:24 ` Jan Beulich
2011-06-01 17:49 ` Daniel Stodden
2011-06-01 18:07 ` Daniel Stodden
2011-06-27 14:03 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-06-27 18:42 ` Daniel Stodden [this message]
2011-06-27 19:13 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-06-28 0:31 ` Daniel Stodden
2011-06-28 13:19 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-31 13:44 ` Fix wrong help message for parameter nestedhvm Dong, Eddie
2011-05-31 16:23 ` Ian Campbell
2011-05-31 16:08 ` [PATCH] xen/blkback: Don't let in-flight requests defer pending ones Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-31 16:30 ` Daniel Stodden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1309200148.24771.13.camel@agari.van.xensource.com \
--to=daniel.stodden@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=pradeepv@amazon.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).