xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
	<devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Cc: xen@lists.fedoraproject.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	lars.kurth@xen.org, virt@lists.fedoraproject.org,
	xen-users@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: Virtualization Test Day for F16 and Xen
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:38:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1316126290.5689.3.camel@adam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110915151041.GA4453@imp.local>

On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 10:10 -0500, W. Michael Petullo wrote:
> >> There are known bugs in FC15/FC16 that have been filled some time ago that
> >> folks will sadly run into: 728775, 658387  and 668063
> >> 
> >> Fortunatly the bugs have patches attached and the files to be modified are shell scripts.
>  
> > Yep, links here:
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728775
> 
> The Fedora update system reports this is fixed in grub2-1.99-6.fc16.
> 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658387
> 
> Peter Jones submitted a new grubby package yesterday. This seems to fix
> bug #658387 (i.e., new-kernel-pkg creates a Dom0-style grub.cfg entry
> if /etc/sysconfig/kernel contains "HYPERVISOR=/boot/xen.gz").
> 
> I have not yet tested this on Fedora 16. However, I did test on Fedora
> 15. In this case, bug #668063 is still in effect. That is, grubby creates
> most of a GRUB record, but the "module initramfs-..." entry is missing.
> 
> Has anyone yet tested this new grubby package on Fedora 16 yet? Does
> using GRUB 2 makes #668063 irrelevant?
> 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668063
> 
> I just added some more description to this bug.

So, there's a meta-point here: we currently 'require' Beta releases to
boot as guests on Xen hosts:

"The release must boot successfully as a virtual guest in a situation
where the virtual host is running a supported Xen implementation"

I really don't have much knowledge of Xen and haven't followed this
discussion closely, but do any currently-known bugs prevent this? If so,
please flag them up so they can be considered as Beta blockers...thanks!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-15 22:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAN0j7xqm5BatDtXaurYZWvb-6ibG2V10aQ5Qck+9P7DjciWLwQ@mail.gmail.com>
2011-09-14 11:25 ` Virtualization Test Day for F16 and Xen Pasi Kärkkäinen
2011-09-14 14:25   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-14 14:45     ` [Fedora-xen] [Xen-devel] " Pasi Kärkkäinen
2011-09-15 15:10       ` W. Michael Petullo
2011-09-15 22:38         ` Adam Williamson [this message]
2011-09-16  8:43           ` [Fedora-xen] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-19 20:24             ` [fedora-virt] [Xen-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-09-21 20:03               ` [Fedora-xen] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-21 22:46                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-09-21 22:59                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-22  9:47                     ` [fedora-virt] " Pasi Kärkkäinen
2011-09-22 19:08                       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-22 19:14                         ` [fedora-virt] [Xen-devel] " Pasi Kärkkäinen
2011-09-22 20:44                 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2011-09-16  9:14           ` Myroslav Opyr
2011-09-16 11:08             ` [fedora-virt] " Richard W.M. Jones
2011-09-16 14:51               ` [Xen-devel] " Pasi Kärkkäinen
2011-09-15 15:12       ` [Xen-devel] Re: Virtualization Test Day for F16 and Xen / dom0 testing instructions Pasi Kärkkäinen
2011-09-15 13:50   ` [fedora-virt] KFT feature proposal review for F17 Anand Nande

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1316126290.5689.3.camel@adam \
    --to=awilliam@redhat.com \
    --cc=devel@lists.fedoraproject.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=lars.kurth@xen.org \
    --cc=virt@lists.fedoraproject.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    --cc=xen-users@lists.xensource.com \
    --cc=xen@lists.fedoraproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).