From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Joe Jin <joe.jin@oracle.com>,
Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] remove blocked time accounting from xen "clockchip"
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:42:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1318970579-6282-1-git-send-email-lersek@redhat.com> (raw)
... because the "clock_event_device framework" already accounts for idle
time through the "event_handler" function pointer in
xen_timer_interrupt().
The patch is intended as the completion of [1]. It should fix the double
idle times seen in PV guests' /proc/stat [2]. It should be orthogonal to
stolen time accounting (the removed code seems to be isolated).
The approach may be completely misguided.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/10/6/10
[2] http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-08/msg01068.html
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/xen/time.c | 17 ++---------------
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/time.c b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
index 163b467..377f6ae 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/time.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
@@ -36,9 +36,8 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct vcpu_runstate_info, xen_runstate);
/* snapshots of runstate info */
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct vcpu_runstate_info, xen_runstate_snapshot);
-/* unused ns of stolen and blocked time */
+/* unused ns of stolen time */
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, xen_residual_stolen);
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, xen_residual_blocked);
/* return an consistent snapshot of 64-bit time/counter value */
static u64 get64(const u64 *p)
@@ -115,7 +114,7 @@ static void do_stolen_accounting(void)
{
struct vcpu_runstate_info state;
struct vcpu_runstate_info *snap;
- s64 blocked, runnable, offline, stolen;
+ s64 runnable, offline, stolen;
cputime_t ticks;
get_runstate_snapshot(&state);
@@ -125,7 +124,6 @@ static void do_stolen_accounting(void)
snap = &__get_cpu_var(xen_runstate_snapshot);
/* work out how much time the VCPU has not been runn*ing* */
- blocked = state.time[RUNSTATE_blocked] - snap->time[RUNSTATE_blocked];
runnable = state.time[RUNSTATE_runnable] - snap->time[RUNSTATE_runnable];
offline = state.time[RUNSTATE_offline] - snap->time[RUNSTATE_offline];
@@ -141,17 +139,6 @@ static void do_stolen_accounting(void)
ticks = iter_div_u64_rem(stolen, NS_PER_TICK, &stolen);
__this_cpu_write(xen_residual_stolen, stolen);
account_steal_ticks(ticks);
-
- /* Add the appropriate number of ticks of blocked time,
- including any left-overs from last time. */
- blocked += __this_cpu_read(xen_residual_blocked);
-
- if (blocked < 0)
- blocked = 0;
-
- ticks = iter_div_u64_rem(blocked, NS_PER_TICK, &blocked);
- __this_cpu_write(xen_residual_blocked, blocked);
- account_idle_ticks(ticks);
}
/* Get the TSC speed from Xen */
--
1.7.4.4
next reply other threads:[~2011-10-18 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-18 20:42 Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2011-10-19 7:51 ` [PATCH] remove blocked time accounting from xen "clockchip" Jan Beulich
2011-10-19 14:54 ` Laszlo Ersek
2011-10-20 14:35 ` Laszlo Ersek
2011-10-20 15:02 ` Laszlo Ersek
2011-10-26 20:52 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-11-09 13:35 ` Jan Beulich
2011-11-09 17:47 ` Laszlo Ersek
2011-11-10 8:32 ` Jan Beulich
2011-11-10 18:05 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2012-01-19 19:42 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-01-20 9:57 ` Jan Beulich
2012-01-20 16:00 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-01-23 22:07 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-12-21 8:32 ` Jan Beulich
2011-12-21 13:53 ` Laszlo Ersek
2011-12-21 14:58 ` Jan Beulich
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-12-22 8:49 Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1318970579-6282-1-git-send-email-lersek@redhat.com \
--to=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=joe.jin@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).