xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
To: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, "Lv, Hui" <hui.lv@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/sched_credit: Use delay to control scheduling frequency
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 10:26:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1324376802.2143.154.camel@elijah> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1324375765.6616.9.camel@Abyss>

On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 10:09 +0000, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 17:44 +0800, Lv, Hui wrote: 
> > > It that constraint enforced anywhere?
> > 
> > Currently, it's not constraint enforced. 
> > I think George have gave the explanation in yesterday's discussion.
> > 
> I think that too, but maybe you can print some kind of warning when it
> happens?

I guess the consensus is that we should put in some effort to make the
interface more polished.

How about this:

First, add a ratelimit_us element to csched_priv, just like the current
tslice_ms element.

When the scheduler comes up (in csched_init), it checks to see if
MICROSECS(sched_ratelimit_us) > MILLISECS(sched_credit_tslice_ms); if
so, it prints a warning, and sets prv->ratelimit_us to
1000*prv->tslice_ms.

In the future, when we implement the domctls to change a scheduler's
ratelimit_us, and tslice_ms, we disallow changes which would violate the
"ratelimit < tslice" rule (returning -EINVAL or something like that).

Thoughts?

 -George

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-20 10:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-19 22:13 [PATCH] xen/sched_credit: Use delay to control scheduling frequency Hui Lv
2011-12-20  9:07 ` Ian Campbell
2011-12-20  9:44   ` Lv, Hui
2011-12-20 10:09     ` Dario Faggioli
2011-12-20 10:26       ` George Dunlap [this message]
2011-12-20 10:51         ` Dario Faggioli
2011-12-20 12:14         ` Lv, Hui
2011-12-20 10:21   ` George Dunlap
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-12-26  8:46 Hui Lv
2012-01-02  8:19 ` Jan Beulich
2012-01-05  4:08   ` Lv, Hui
2012-01-06 19:50   ` George Dunlap
2012-01-06 19:56 ` George Dunlap
2012-01-08 12:03   ` Lv, Hui
2012-01-09  9:49     ` George Dunlap
2012-01-09 10:22 Hui Lv
2012-01-10 10:05 ` George Dunlap
2012-01-24 12:01   ` George Dunlap
2012-01-24 14:17     ` Keir Fraser
2012-01-24 14:31       ` George Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1324376802.2143.154.camel@elijah \
    --to=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=hui.lv@intel.com \
    --cc=raistlin@linux.it \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).