xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: Wei Wang2 <wei.wang2@amd.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>,
	"allen.m.kay@intel.com" <allen.m.kay@intel.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCHv2 1 of 2] Move IOMMU faults handling into softirq for VT-d.
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:25:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1325777149.2728.9.camel@Solace> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1325776241.2728.5.camel@Solace>


[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3067 bytes --]

Dealing with interrupts from VT-d IOMMU(s) is deferred to a softirq-tasklet,
raised by the actual IRQ handler. Since a new interrupt is not generated,
even if further faults occur, until we cleared all the pending ones,
there's no need of disabling IRQs, as the hardware does it by its own.
Notice that this may cause the log to overflow, but none of the existing
entry will be overwritten.

Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>

diff -r efaa28639a71 xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c	Wed Jan 04 16:12:44 2012 +0000
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c	Thu Jan 05 15:17:47 2012 +0100
@@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ bool_t __read_mostly untrusted_msi;
 
 int nr_iommus;
 
+static struct tasklet vtd_fault_tasklet;
+
 static void setup_dom0_device(struct pci_dev *);
 static void setup_dom0_rmrr(struct domain *d);
 
@@ -918,10 +920,8 @@ static void iommu_fault_status(u32 fault
 }
 
 #define PRIMARY_FAULT_REG_LEN (16)
-static void iommu_page_fault(int irq, void *dev_id,
-                             struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
+static void __do_iommu_page_fault(struct iommu *iommu)
 {
-    struct iommu *iommu = dev_id;
     int reg, fault_index;
     u32 fault_status;
     unsigned long flags;
@@ -996,6 +996,37 @@ clear_overflow:
     }
 }
 
+static void do_iommu_page_fault(unsigned long data)
+{
+    struct acpi_drhd_unit *drhd;
+
+    if ( list_empty(&acpi_drhd_units) )
+    {
+       INTEL_IOMMU_DEBUG("no device found, something must be very wrong!\n");
+       return;
+    }
+
+    /*
+     * No matter from whom the interrupt came from, check all the
+     * IOMMUs present in the system. This allows for having just one
+     * tasklet (instead of one per each IOMMUs) and should be more than
+     * fine, considering how rare the event of a fault should be.
+     */
+    for_each_drhd_unit ( drhd )
+        __do_iommu_page_fault(drhd->iommu);
+}
+
+static void iommu_page_fault(int irq, void *dev_id,
+                             struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
+{
+    /*
+     * Just flag the tasklet as runnable. This is fine, according to VT-d
+     * specs since a new interrupt won't be generated until we clear all
+     * the faults that caused this one to happen.
+     */
+    tasklet_schedule(&vtd_fault_tasklet);
+}
+
 static void dma_msi_unmask(struct irq_desc *desc)
 {
     struct iommu *iommu = desc->action->dev_id;
@@ -2144,6 +2175,8 @@ int __init intel_vtd_setup(void)
         iommu->irq = ret;
     }
 
+    softirq_tasklet_init(&vtd_fault_tasklet, do_iommu_page_fault, 0);
+
     if ( !iommu_qinval && iommu_intremap )
     {
         iommu_intremap = 0;

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
PhD Candidate, ReTiS Lab, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa (Italy)


[-- Attachment #1.1.2: iommu-fault-tasklet_vtd.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2858 bytes --]

# HG changeset patch
# Parent efaa28639a71524a693ba500624f8512e5795e18
Move IOMMU faults handling into softirq for VT-d.

Dealing with interrupts from VT-d IOMMU(s) is deferred to a softirq-tasklet,
raised by the actual IRQ handler. Since a new interrupt is not generated,
even if further faults occur, until we cleared all the pending ones,
there's no need of disabling IRQs, as the hardware does it by its own.
Notice that this may cause the log to overflow, but none of the existing
entry will be overwritten.

Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>

diff -r efaa28639a71 xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c	Wed Jan 04 16:12:44 2012 +0000
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c	Thu Jan 05 15:17:47 2012 +0100
@@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ bool_t __read_mostly untrusted_msi;
 
 int nr_iommus;
 
+static struct tasklet vtd_fault_tasklet;
+
 static void setup_dom0_device(struct pci_dev *);
 static void setup_dom0_rmrr(struct domain *d);
 
@@ -918,10 +920,8 @@ static void iommu_fault_status(u32 fault
 }
 
 #define PRIMARY_FAULT_REG_LEN (16)
-static void iommu_page_fault(int irq, void *dev_id,
-                             struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
+static void __do_iommu_page_fault(struct iommu *iommu)
 {
-    struct iommu *iommu = dev_id;
     int reg, fault_index;
     u32 fault_status;
     unsigned long flags;
@@ -996,6 +996,37 @@ clear_overflow:
     }
 }
 
+static void do_iommu_page_fault(unsigned long data)
+{
+    struct acpi_drhd_unit *drhd;
+
+    if ( list_empty(&acpi_drhd_units) )
+    {
+       INTEL_IOMMU_DEBUG("no device found, something must be very wrong!\n");
+       return;
+    }
+
+    /*
+     * No matter from whom the interrupt came from, check all the
+     * IOMMUs present in the system. This allows for having just one
+     * tasklet (instead of one per each IOMMUs) and should be more than
+     * fine, considering how rare the event of a fault should be.
+     */
+    for_each_drhd_unit ( drhd )
+        __do_iommu_page_fault(drhd->iommu);
+}
+
+static void iommu_page_fault(int irq, void *dev_id,
+                             struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
+{
+    /*
+     * Just flag the tasklet as runnable. This is fine, according to VT-d
+     * specs since a new interrupt won't be generated until we clear all
+     * the faults that caused this one to happen.
+     */
+    tasklet_schedule(&vtd_fault_tasklet);
+}
+
 static void dma_msi_unmask(struct irq_desc *desc)
 {
     struct iommu *iommu = desc->action->dev_id;
@@ -2144,6 +2175,8 @@ int __init intel_vtd_setup(void)
         iommu->irq = ret;
     }
 
+    softirq_tasklet_init(&vtd_fault_tasklet, do_iommu_page_fault, 0);
+
     if ( !iommu_qinval && iommu_intremap )
     {
         iommu_intremap = 0;

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-05 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-05 15:10 [PATCHv2 0 of 2] Deal with IOMMU faults in softirq context Dario Faggioli
2012-01-05 15:25 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2012-01-17 11:17   ` [PATCHv2 1 of 2] Move IOMMU faults handling into softirq for VT-d Keir Fraser
2012-01-05 15:27 ` [PATCHv2 2 of 2] Move IOMMU faults handling into softirq for AMD-Vi Dario Faggioli
2012-01-17 11:17   ` Keir Fraser
2012-01-18  8:53     ` Dario Faggioli
2012-01-18 10:40       ` Wei Wang
2012-01-18 10:59         ` Dario Faggioli
2012-01-18 13:51         ` [PATCHv3] " Dario Faggioli
2012-01-18 15:53           ` Wei Wang
2012-01-18 15:57             ` Dario Faggioli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1325777149.2728.9.camel@Solace \
    --to=raistlin@linux.it \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=allen.m.kay@intel.com \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=wei.wang2@amd.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).