From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
To: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Marcus Granado <Marcus.Granado@eu.citrix.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xenoprof: Make the escape code consistent across 32 and 64-bit xen
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:40:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1327340433.26455.338.camel@elijah> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CB4349F0.37FDB%keir@xen.org>
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 17:31 +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:
> > I really prefer to keep patches with no functional change separate from
> > those with a pretty major functional change; even if the major
> > functional change is only one line. :-)
>
> The one-line major functional change didn't work. Obviously the other
> changes to make it build must be part of the same logical patch.
Perhaps "functional" change isn't what I meant, so much as
"guest-visible behavior change".
If I were writing this patch series from the beginning, I'd have one
patch which "fixed" the various internal functions to use 64-bits for
EIP, since even in 32-bit that value in the struct can be 64-bit. That
patch by itself could have a bug in it, and so as a reviewer /
archaeologist, *I* would have preferred it did just that one thing, so I
didn't have to figure out what each individual line was supposed to be
doing. Then the guest-visible functional change would have been its own
patch.
In any case, I'll send a combined patch tomorrow, since that seems
preferred.
-George
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-23 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-20 18:45 [PATCH 3/3] xenoprof: Make the escape code consistent across 32 and 64-bit xen Marcus Granado
2012-01-23 9:57 ` Jan Beulich
2012-01-23 10:16 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-23 10:47 ` Jan Beulich
2012-01-23 14:04 ` Jan Beulich
2012-01-23 16:01 ` George Dunlap
2012-01-23 16:30 ` Jan Beulich
2012-01-23 16:51 ` George Dunlap
2012-01-23 17:01 ` Jan Beulich
2012-01-23 17:31 ` Keir Fraser
2012-01-23 17:40 ` George Dunlap [this message]
2012-01-24 8:50 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1327340433.26455.338.camel@elijah \
--to=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=Marcus.Granado@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).