xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: xen: size struct xen_spinlock to always fit in arch_spinlock_t
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 19:32:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1327347145-16439-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com> (raw)

From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>

If NR_CPUS < 256 then arch_spinlock_t is only 16 bits wide but struct
xen_spinlock is 32 bits.  When a spin lock is contended and
xl->spinners is modified the two bytes immediately after the spin lock
would be corrupted.

This is a regression caused by 84eb950db13ca40a0572ce9957e14723500943d6
(x86, ticketlock: Clean up types and accessors) which reduced the size
of arch_spinlock_t.

Fix this by making xl->spinners a u8 if NR_CPUS < 256.  A
BUILD_BUG_ON() is also added to check the sizes of the two structures
are compatible.

In many cases this was not noticable as there would often be padding
bytes after the lock (e.g., if any of CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK,
CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK, or CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC were enabled).

The bnx2 driver is affected. In struct bnx2, phy_lock and
indirect_lock may have no padding after them.  Contention on phy_lock
would corrupt indirect_lock making it appear locked and the driver
would deadlock.

Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
---
 arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c |   27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
index cc9b1e1..d69cc6c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
@@ -116,9 +116,26 @@ static inline void spin_time_accum_blocked(u64 start)
 }
 #endif  /* CONFIG_XEN_DEBUG_FS */
 
+/*
+ * Size struct xen_spinlock so it's the same as arch_spinlock_t.
+ */
+#if NR_CPUS < 256
+typedef u8 xen_spinners_t;
+# define inc_spinners(xl) \
+	asm(LOCK_PREFIX " incb %0" : "+m" ((xl)->spinners) : : "memory");
+# define dec_spinners(xl) \
+	asm(LOCK_PREFIX " decb %0" : "+m" ((xl)->spinners) : : "memory");
+#else
+typedef u16 xen_spinners_t;
+# define inc_spinners(xl) \
+	asm(LOCK_PREFIX " incw %0" : "+m" ((xl)->spinners) : : "memory");
+# define dec_spinners(xl) \
+	asm(LOCK_PREFIX " decw %0" : "+m" ((xl)->spinners) : : "memory");
+#endif
+
 struct xen_spinlock {
 	unsigned char lock;		/* 0 -> free; 1 -> locked */
-	unsigned short spinners;	/* count of waiting cpus */
+	xen_spinners_t spinners;	/* count of waiting cpus */
 };
 
 static int xen_spin_is_locked(struct arch_spinlock *lock)
@@ -164,8 +181,7 @@ static inline struct xen_spinlock *spinning_lock(struct xen_spinlock *xl)
 
 	wmb();			/* set lock of interest before count */
 
-	asm(LOCK_PREFIX " incw %0"
-	    : "+m" (xl->spinners) : : "memory");
+	inc_spinners(xl);
 
 	return prev;
 }
@@ -176,8 +192,7 @@ static inline struct xen_spinlock *spinning_lock(struct xen_spinlock *xl)
  */
 static inline void unspinning_lock(struct xen_spinlock *xl, struct xen_spinlock *prev)
 {
-	asm(LOCK_PREFIX " decw %0"
-	    : "+m" (xl->spinners) : : "memory");
+	dec_spinners(xl);
 	wmb();			/* decrement count before restoring lock */
 	__this_cpu_write(lock_spinners, prev);
 }
@@ -373,6 +388,8 @@ void xen_uninit_lock_cpu(int cpu)
 
 void __init xen_init_spinlocks(void)
 {
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct xen_spinlock) > sizeof(arch_spinlock_t));
+
 	pv_lock_ops.spin_is_locked = xen_spin_is_locked;
 	pv_lock_ops.spin_is_contended = xen_spin_is_contended;
 	pv_lock_ops.spin_lock = xen_spin_lock;
-- 
1.7.2.5

             reply	other threads:[~2012-01-23 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-23 19:32 David Vrabel [this message]
2012-01-23 19:50 ` [PATCH] x86: xen: size struct xen_spinlock to always fit in arch_spinlock_t Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-01-23 21:44   ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2012-01-24  0:28     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-01-23 20:57 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2012-01-24 12:29 ` Ian Campbell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1327347145-16439-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).