From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: xen-arm@lists.xensource.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com,
smithjenny183@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] arm: support fewer LRs register than virtual irqs
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:07:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1329224864-10235-1-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
If the vgic needs to inject a virtual irq into the guest, but no free
LR registers are available, add the irq to a list and return.
Whenever an LR register becomes available we add the queued irq to it
and remove it from the list.
We use the gic lock to protect the list and the bitmask.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
---
xen/arch/arm/gic.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
index adc10bb..97c223c 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
#include <xen/sched.h>
#include <xen/errno.h>
#include <xen/softirq.h>
+#include <xen/list.h>
#include <asm/p2m.h>
#include <asm/domain.h>
@@ -45,6 +46,8 @@ static struct {
unsigned int lines;
unsigned int cpus;
spinlock_t lock;
+ uint64_t lr_mask;
+ struct list_head lr_pending;
} gic;
irq_desc_t irq_desc[NR_IRQS];
@@ -247,6 +250,8 @@ static void __cpuinit gic_hyp_init(void)
GICH[GICH_HCR] = GICH_HCR_EN;
GICH[GICH_MISR] = GICH_MISR_EOI;
+ gic.lr_mask = 0ULL;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gic.lr_pending);
}
/* Set up the GIC */
@@ -345,16 +350,35 @@ int __init setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irqaction *new)
return rc;
}
-void gic_set_guest_irq(unsigned int virtual_irq,
+static inline void gic_set_lr(int lr, unsigned int virtual_irq,
unsigned int state, unsigned int priority)
{
- BUG_ON(virtual_irq > nr_lrs);
- GICH[GICH_LR + virtual_irq] = state |
+ BUG_ON(lr > nr_lrs);
+ GICH[GICH_LR + lr] = state |
GICH_LR_MAINTENANCE_IRQ |
((priority >> 3) << GICH_LR_PRIORITY_SHIFT) |
((virtual_irq & GICH_LR_VIRTUAL_MASK) << GICH_LR_VIRTUAL_SHIFT);
}
+void gic_set_guest_irq(unsigned int virtual_irq,
+ unsigned int state, unsigned int priority)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ spin_lock(&gic.lock);
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_lrs; i++) {
+ if (!test_and_set_bit(i, &gic.lr_mask))
+ {
+ gic_set_lr(i, virtual_irq, state, priority);
+ spin_unlock(&gic.lock);
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+ list_add_tail(&irq_to_pending(current, virtual_irq)->lr_link, &gic.lr_pending);
+ spin_unlock(&gic.lock);
+ return;
+}
+
void gic_inject_irq_start(void)
{
uint32_t hcr;
@@ -435,13 +459,26 @@ static void maintenance_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct cpu_user_regs *r
uint32_t lr;
uint64_t eisr = GICH[GICH_EISR0] | (((uint64_t) GICH[GICH_EISR1]) << 32);
- for ( i = 0; i < 64; i++ ) {
+ for ( i = 0; i < nr_lrs; i++ ) {
if ( eisr & ((uint64_t)1 << i) ) {
struct pending_irq *p;
+ spin_lock(&gic.lock);
lr = GICH[GICH_LR + i];
virq = lr & GICH_LR_VIRTUAL_MASK;
GICH[GICH_LR + i] = 0;
+ clear_bit(i, &gic.lr_mask);
+
+ if ( !list_empty(gic.lr_pending.next) ) {
+ p = list_entry(gic.lr_pending.next, typeof(*p), lr_link);
+ gic_set_lr(i, p->irq, GICH_LR_PENDING, p->priority);
+ list_del(&p->lr_link);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->lr_link);
+ set_bit(i, &gic.lr_mask);
+ } else {
+ gic_inject_irq_stop();
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&gic.lock);
spin_lock(¤t->arch.vgic.lock);
p = irq_to_pending(current, virq);
@@ -449,7 +486,6 @@ static void maintenance_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct cpu_user_regs *r
p->desc->status &= ~IRQ_INPROGRESS;
GICC[GICC_DIR] = virq;
}
- gic_inject_irq_stop();
list_del(&p->link);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->link);
cpu_raise_softirq(current->processor, VGIC_SOFTIRQ);
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
index 3372d14..75095ff 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ struct pending_irq
struct irq_desc *desc; /* only set it the irq corresponds to a physical irq */
uint8_t priority;
struct list_head link;
+ struct list_head lr_link;
};
struct arch_domain
--
1.7.8.3
next reply other threads:[~2012-02-14 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-14 13:07 Stefano Stabellini [this message]
2012-02-14 13:11 ` [XenARM] [PATCH] arm: support fewer LRs register than virtual irqs Ian Campbell
2012-02-14 13:34 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-02-14 15:25 ` David Vrabel
2012-02-15 12:35 ` Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1329224864-10235-1-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--to=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=smithjenny183@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-arm@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).