From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: backport requests for 4.x-testing Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:38:42 -0800 Message-ID: <1331149122.14355.4.camel@cthulhu.hellion.org.uk> References: <4F573C28.1050305@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F573C28.1050305@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Andrew Cooper Cc: "Keir (Xen.org)" , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 05:44 -0500, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 07/03/12 09:43, Keir Fraser wrote: > > On 06/03/2012 11:04, "Andrew Cooper" wrote: > >> 24542, 24543, 24570, 24571 (xenoprof fixes) > > These changesets do not relate to xenoprof?? > > So they are not. It appears that there was an off-by-6 numbering error > in our patch queue for these patches. Apologies for that. These rev numbers are not globally meaningful, you need to use the node hash if you want to reliably refer to particular changesets.