From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
To: Teck Choon Giam <giamteckchoon@gmail.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Lin Ming <mlin@ss.pku.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: Upgrade from xen-4.1-testing to xen-unstable report
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:08:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1334214539.12209.219.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEwRVpM20XwC54SoyM44Ya=_MS_uNkLLnwOTT0rOoxhBX+yvbA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 22:23 +0100, Teck Choon Giam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is just my experience about issues I encountered when upgrade
> from xen-4.1-testing changeset 23277:80130491806f to xen-unstable
> changeset 25191:a95fc7decc83.
>
> 1. Immediately after upgrade, xl list show such error:
>
> # xl list
> libxl: error: libxl.c:506:libxl_list_domain: geting domain info list:
> Permission denied
> libxl_domain_infolist failed.
>
> After a reboot, it is fine. Any idea why such behaviour? Imagine if
> there are running domUs... this might cause issues to shutdown? I
> will downgrade and repeat such test to confirm. Might be worth a note
> in upgrading note about this if this is intended?
The tools and the hypervisor are a matched pair so you would need to
reboot the system in order to use the new tools. This has always been
the case with Xen upgrades.
> 2. localtime setting not working. Set to localtime=1 doesn't seems to
> work whereby setting rtc_timeoffset works. Any idea?
I've CC'd Lin Ming who implemented both of those.
> 3. xl trigger hvmdomain power still never remove those related
> iptables forward rules. This is the same problem when I test in
> xen-4.1-testing. Refer to
> http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2012-02/msg00771.html
> about past report. When test in xen-4.1-testing, one funny behaviour
> is if I start hvmdomain using xm then use xl trigger hvmdomain power
> does remove those iptables related rule chain.
I think this is an issue with the hotplug scripts not being run at the
right time. There are some improvements to this in the pipeline which I
hope will help here.
> I shall do more testing when time permit and sorry if this report is
> useless to anyone.
On the contrary it is always useful to hear about these things, thank
you.
Ian.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-12 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-11 21:23 Upgrade from xen-4.1-testing to xen-unstable report Teck Choon Giam
2012-04-12 7:08 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2012-04-12 11:44 ` Teck Choon Giam
2012-04-12 12:50 ` Lin Ming
2012-04-12 14:03 ` Ian Campbell
2012-04-12 14:42 ` Lin Ming
2012-04-12 14:50 ` Ian Campbell
2012-04-12 15:25 ` Teck Choon Giam
2012-04-12 16:27 ` Teck Choon Giam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1334214539.12209.219.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=giamteckchoon@gmail.com \
--cc=mlin@ss.pku.edu.cn \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).