From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] xen: correctly check for pending events when restoring irq flags
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:44:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1335465846-22229-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com> (raw)
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
In xen_restore_fl_direct(), xen_force_evtchn_callback() was being
called even if no events were pending. This resulted in (depending on
workload) about a 100 times as many xen_version hypercalls as
necessary.
Fix this by correcting the sense of the conditional jump.
This seems to give a significant performance benefit for some
workloads.
Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
---
I'd prefer to do more testing and benchmarking but the gains appear to
be significant. e.g., lmbench3's 'lat_proc fork' test has improved
from 404 us to 357 us (~11% faster).
---
arch/x86/xen/xen-asm.S | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/xen-asm.S b/arch/x86/xen/xen-asm.S
index 79d7362..3e45aa0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/xen-asm.S
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/xen-asm.S
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ ENTRY(xen_restore_fl_direct)
/* check for unmasked and pending */
cmpw $0x0001, PER_CPU_VAR(xen_vcpu_info) + XEN_vcpu_info_pending
- jz 1f
+ jnz 1f
2: call check_events
1:
ENDPATCH(xen_restore_fl_direct)
--
1.7.2.5
next reply other threads:[~2012-04-26 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-26 18:44 David Vrabel [this message]
2012-04-26 20:08 ` [PATCH] xen: correctly check for pending events when restoring irq flags Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-04-27 8:47 ` Ian Campbell
2012-04-27 11:41 ` David Vrabel
2012-04-27 11:42 ` Jan Beulich
2012-04-27 11:58 ` Ian Campbell
2012-04-27 12:46 ` Jan Beulich
2012-04-27 13:09 ` Ian Campbell
2012-04-27 13:51 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1335465846-22229-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).