From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03 of 11] libxc,
 libxl: introduce xc_nodemap_t and libxl_nodemap
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 16:32:46 +0200
Message-ID: <1338474766.15014.29.camel@Solace>
References: <patchbomb.1338466265@Solace>
	<7d16724e5eced0986454.1338466268@Solace>
	<20423.31829.306495.960607@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5164461962337176225=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <20423.31829.306495.960607@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>, Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org


--===============5164461962337176225==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-FFuPbZlvJeGRswGsKsci"


--=-FFuPbZlvJeGRswGsKsci
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 15:12 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Dario Faggioli writes ("[PATCH 03 of 11] libxc, libxl: introduce xc_nodem=
ap_t and libxl_nodemap"):
> > As NUMA node-related counterparts of xc_cpumap_t and libxl_cpumap.
>=20
> Wouldn't it be possible to just use `libxl_map' type directly, with
> the caller knowing whether it contains node or cpu numbers ?
>=20
Definitely possible.

> As it is this has a whole lot of duplicated wrapper code.
>=20
I agree, and I will do that.

Thanks and Regards,
Dario

--=20
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


--=-FFuPbZlvJeGRswGsKsci
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk/HgQ4ACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTAAQCfXB1QN7tk6qP+w2ZUT6+Zy6IT
34cAn3MIKOBAk0pS5lKv1rIOOR6SGOLH
=ZxGM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-FFuPbZlvJeGRswGsKsci--



--===============5164461962337176225==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

--===============5164461962337176225==--