From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xl: check for meaningful combination of
 sedf config file parameters
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 12:48:27 +0200
Message-ID: <1338979707.6152.18.camel@Solace>
References: <3eadab19abd49fbc6f56.1338818483@Solace>
	<20431.13287.208744.519066@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3188883009246489539=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <20431.13287.208744.519066@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>, Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org


--===============3188883009246489539==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-HE5UClY673wDFtpZ17vS"


--=-HE5UClY673wDFtpZ17vS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 11:41 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Dario Faggioli writes ("[PATCH] xl: check for meaningful combination of s=
edf config file parameters"):
> > As we do it in the implementation of `xl sched-sedf -d ...', some
> > consistency checking is needed while parsing the sedf scheduling
> > parameters provided via config file. Not doing this results in the call
> > libxl_domain_sched_params_set() to fail, and no parameters being
> > enforced for the domain.
>=20
> Why does xl continue after libxl_domain_sched_params_set fails ?
>=20
Well, that I really don't know. It has always been like this I guess, it
just print the related error about inconsistent/wrong scheduling
parameters and then the domain is created with default ones.

Should we/I stop it?

Dario

--=20
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


--=-HE5UClY673wDFtpZ17vS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEUEABECAAYFAk/PNXsACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTqDQCfYWyw8BjnrDMGPcrrwJtxERiP
81MAmKuI5jFpr6ekQhZOsqbY8LAf1PQ=
=9fBm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-HE5UClY673wDFtpZ17vS--



--===============3188883009246489539==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

--===============3188883009246489539==--