From: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
"Keir (Xen.org)" <keir@xen.org>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [xen-unstable bisection] complete test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 19:12:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1340212332.20225.13.camel@Solace> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20449.60686.870961.578671@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1070 bytes --]
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 16:32 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Which means it might be unrelated from that specific commit (sorry if
> > it's a stupid question, just want to be sure I'm getting things
> > correct :-/ )
>
> No. If it fails with 9d1fd58ff602 and succeeds with 32034d1914a6 then
> 9d1fd58ff602 is responsible because 32034d1914a6 is the only parent of
> 9d1fd58ff602.
>
I see.
> Flights 13095, 13102 and 13105 used code built from from 9d1fd58ff602
> and failed. These all used the builds from flight 13033, which was
> another bisector run.
>
> It is possible that the build in 13033 is broken somehow.
>
Well, I couldn't say how that change could affect a non-sedf run
otherwise! :-(
Let's see what future flights will tell us...
Thanks and Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-20 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-20 2:40 [xen-unstable bisection] complete test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 xen.org
2012-06-20 7:51 ` Jan Beulich
2012-06-20 9:06 ` Ian Campbell
2012-06-20 10:34 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-06-20 13:43 ` Ian Jackson
2012-06-20 14:01 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-06-20 15:32 ` Ian Jackson
2012-06-20 17:12 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2012-06-20 17:18 ` Dario Faggioli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1340212332.20225.13.camel@Solace \
--to=raistlin@linux.it \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).