From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Subject: Re: [xen-unstable bisection] complete
 test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 19:12:12 +0200
Message-ID: <1340212332.20225.13.camel@Solace>
References: <E1ShAqS-0008GB-H9@woking.cam.xci-test.com>
	<4FE19D1B020000780008ABDB@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
	<1340183168.4906.8.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
	<20449.54129.523732.173929@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
	<1340200879.20225.11.camel@Solace>
	<20449.60686.870961.578671@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6584221254643905027=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <20449.60686.870961.578671@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, "Keir (Xen.org)" <keir@xen.org>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org


--===============6584221254643905027==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-XySzu4peFZzD7o8xCmAm"


--=-XySzu4peFZzD7o8xCmAm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 16:32 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Which means it might be unrelated from that specific commit (sorry if
> > it's a stupid question, just want to be sure I'm getting things
> > correct :-/ )
>=20
> No.  If it fails with 9d1fd58ff602 and succeeds with 32034d1914a6 then
> 9d1fd58ff602 is responsible because 32034d1914a6 is the only parent of
> 9d1fd58ff602.
>=20
I see.

> Flights 13095, 13102 and 13105 used code built from from 9d1fd58ff602
> and failed.  These all used the builds from flight 13033, which was
> another bisector run.
>=20
> It is possible that the build in 13033 is broken somehow.
>
Well, I couldn't say how that change could affect a non-sedf run
otherwise! :-(

Let's see what future flights will tell us...

Thanks and Regards,
Dario

--=20
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


--=-XySzu4peFZzD7o8xCmAm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk/iBGwACgkQk4XaBE3IOsRVnwCgmWsimsEv8+4YDjJp/tN+8fCe
bcIAnRCEwubyDxX3mj5u/A7f1ubS+qxo
=13Cq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-XySzu4peFZzD7o8xCmAm--



--===============6584221254643905027==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

--===============6584221254643905027==--