From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08 of 10 v2] libxl: enable automatic
 placement of guests on NUMA nodes
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:38:05 +0200
Message-ID: <1340962685.5711.0.camel@Abyss>
References: <patchbomb.1339779868@Solace>
	<81f18379bb3d4d9397d1.1339779876@Solace>
	<A9667DDFB95DB7438FA9D7D576C3D87E1BDD1C@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
	<1340878329.21008.2.camel@Solace> <20120628124106.GL2058@reaktio.net>
	<1340902989.17236.5.camel@Solace>
	<A9667DDFB95DB7438FA9D7D576C3D87E1D5F48@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6077595640562927361=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <A9667DDFB95DB7438FA9D7D576C3D87E1D5F48@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: "Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>, Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org


--===============6077595640562927361==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-sNVaO5EHjENQqQlG5AVN"


--=-sNVaO5EHjENQqQlG5AVN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 05:29 +0000, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:=20
> > However, I'm still not sure I see how that ("guest NUMA") and live
> > migration should affect (either now or during 4.3 dev cycle) the initia=
l
> > placement of a domain... That's what I was asking.
>=20
> When doing migration, if the target machine is able to provide the same m=
emory framework for the guest, we need to consider it firstly.
>
Ok, I see, and I think it make sense. Thanks for replying. :-)

Dario

--=20
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)



--=-sNVaO5EHjENQqQlG5AVN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk/td30ACgkQk4XaBE3IOsRd/ACeM+caDPbBBdAXClxKqBst3kGh
6NwAn1mt4d6HWzG8sFY6Vt8evEn/Gps4
=zOgT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-sNVaO5EHjENQqQlG5AVN--



--===============6077595640562927361==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

--===============6077595640562927361==--