From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08 of 10 v3] libxl: enable automatic
 placement of guests on NUMA nodes
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 15:00:35 +0200
Message-ID: <1341579635.15708.17.camel@Abyss>
References: <patchbomb.1341418679@Solace>
	<7087d3622ee2051654c9.1341418687@Solace>
	<4FF6CC5C.1060905@eu.citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1748958792708711583=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <4FF6CC5C.1060905@eu.citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>, Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org


--===============1748958792708711583==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-05Q7pbSMOw8i3BwZGVt9"


--=-05Q7pbSMOw8i3BwZGVt9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 12:30 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:=20
> One question I have:  Is there any particular reason to sort the whole=
=20
> list, rather than just finding the maximum based on the comparison functi=
on?
>=20
That is basically a leftover from my previous "let's make things a bit
more general" approach. Don't get me wrong, I still think that and like
sorting more than anything else for the interface (although it's an
"internal interface") but yes, right now looking for the max won't be
anything different from sorting descending and taking the #0 element.

> But I think it's been a long time and it looks good enough to me:
>=20
> Acked-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
>
Ok, I get this like I can leave it as it is... Or you want me to kill
the sorting?

Thanks and Regards,
Dario

--=20
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)



--=-05Q7pbSMOw8i3BwZGVt9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk/24XMACgkQk4XaBE3IOsRWKwCgmVjQm3BWBa2kg+zL1ZewHRiS
B38AnjniK9/REFadMezw57WKmzMe4XWz
=IvpO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-05Q7pbSMOw8i3BwZGVt9--



--===============1748958792708711583==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

--===============1748958792708711583==--