From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2 of 2 RFC] xl: allow for moving the
 domain's memory when changing vcpu affinity
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 16:05:50 +0200
Message-ID: <1341583550.15708.47.camel@Abyss>
References: <patchbomb.1341568443@Solace>
	<89aba27edf62271a4862.1341568445@Solace>
	<4FF6DFE5.7060403@eu.citrix.com>
	<1341581104.32747.43.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5975491130254888270=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <1341581104.32747.43.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>, "Zhang,
	Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org


--===============5975491130254888270==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-MK3ZFjm9MEYD44AbgzgD"


--=-MK3ZFjm9MEYD44AbgzgD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 14:25 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:=20
> We could do something cleverer for HVM (or hybrid) guests to migrate
> pages while the guest is live but migrating a page under a PV guest's
> feet requires quiescing it in the style of a migrate.
>=20
Which, as we're talking about the same host, means reaching a point
where I have two full copies of the guest memory in RAM, or not?

(Just trying to figure out if I understood things sensibly).

> We could probably manage to make it such that you just need the
> pause/frob/unpause phases without actually writing RAM to disk,=20
>
Of course, that was in my e-mail too (it's about the above that I'm not
100% sure...).

> and that
> infrastructure might be useful for other reasons I suppose.=20
>
Definitely.

Thanks and Regards,
Dario

--=20
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)



--=-MK3ZFjm9MEYD44AbgzgD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk/28L4ACgkQk4XaBE3IOsSmbQCcCY/cdUasM1WtkO9GtQhdBuIL
foIAn22xVZNdZOvi0d25bJf41NcVEPev
=Vdv2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-MK3ZFjm9MEYD44AbgzgD--



--===============5975491130254888270==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

--===============5975491130254888270==--