From: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
To: Andrew Kane <Andrew.Kane@dornerworks.com>
Cc: george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
Steve.VanderLeest@dornerworks.com, Ian.Campbell@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] libxl: libxl_domain_sched_params_set case for ARINC 653 scheduler
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 00:11:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1343254307.27607.9.camel@Abyss> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8EB52695-0D2C-4C2A-ABBA-F163A4F25B0E@dornerworks.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1028 bytes --]
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 14:11 -0400, Andrew Kane wrote:
> We would like to delay implementing libxl_domain_sched_params_get and the
> associated xl call structure until we have integrated our in-house
> configuration tool with xl. Otherwise we'd have a long call tree to nowhere
> and an xl subcommand that doesn't do anything. =)
>
That sounds reasonable. I was only asking because, with the current
code, invoking libxl_domain_sched_params_get(), with the ARINC scheduler
as a parameter, would result in the call failing and in an error message
saying "Unknown scheduler".
However, you're the sole users of it that I know of, so, if you're fine
with that, and nobody else complains, I'm fine with it too. :-)
Thanks and Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-25 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-25 15:42 [PATCH v2] libxl: libxl_domain_sched_params_set case for ARINC 653 scheduler Andrew Kane
2012-07-25 15:45 ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-25 16:41 ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-25 15:48 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-07-25 18:11 ` Andrew Kane
2012-07-25 22:11 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1343254307.27607.9.camel@Abyss \
--to=raistlin@linux.it \
--cc=Andrew.Kane@dornerworks.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Steve.VanderLeest@dornerworks.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).