From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Subject: Re: NUMA TODO-list for xen-devel
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 15:21:36 +0200
Message-ID: <1343913696.4873.7.camel@Solace>
References: <1343837796.4958.32.camel@Solace> <501959BE.60801@citrix.com>
	<501A672B02000078000921EA@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4600879891119173199=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <501A672B02000078000921EA@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>, Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@recoil.org>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>, George Dunlap <dunlapg@gmail.com>, Yang Z Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org


--===============4600879891119173199==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-8emHdb/BuF7bVjc4jS9S"


--=-8emHdb/BuF7bVjc4jS9S
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 10:40 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 01.08.12 at 18:30, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote=
:
> > - Xen NUMA internals.  Placing items such as the per-cpu stacks and dat=
a
> > area on the local NUMA node, rather than unconditionally on node 0 at
> > the moment.  As part of this, there will be changes to
> > alloc_{dom,xen}heap_page() to allow specification of which node(s) to
> > allocate memory from.
>=20
> Those interfaces already support flags to be passed, including a
> node ID. It just needs to be made use of in more places.
>=20
Yes, I also remember it being already node_affinity conscious, and think
it's more a matter of how it is called. I'll update the wiki accordingly
(it doesn't need to contain these sort of details anyway).

Thanks and Regards,
Dario

--=20
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


--=-8emHdb/BuF7bVjc4jS9S
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAlAafuAACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTGMgCdHFyXFI2cYdphRL/+QWTJ7RMB
1sgAnR8QG3grvhsu6NSd6KgXR7N2arNs
=YXRA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-8emHdb/BuF7bVjc4jS9S--



--===============4600879891119173199==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

--===============4600879891119173199==--