From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/8]: PVH: Basic and preparatory changes Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:36:00 +0100 Message-ID: <1345232160.23624.1.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> References: <20120815175724.3405043a@mantra.us.oracle.com> <20120816114650.4db2079f@mantra.us.oracle.com> <20120817122014.3c3387b5@mantra.us.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120817122014.3c3387b5@mantra.us.oracle.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Mukesh Rathor Cc: "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 20:20 +0100, Mukesh Rathor wrote: > yeah, I thought about that, but wasn't sure what the implications would > be for a guest thats not PVH but has auto xlated physmap, if there's > such a possibility. If you guys think thats not an issue, I can change > it. I think you are basically never going to come across that situation in real life. But if you are worried you could check for that combination at boot and panic or something like that, which would mean you could not worry about it at runtime. Ian.