From: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
To: "xen.org" <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 13924: tolerable FAIL
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 16:46:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1349448373.18984.27.camel@Solace> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <osstest-13924-mainreport@xen.org>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1360 bytes --]
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 07:35 +0100, xen.org wrote:
> flight 13924 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/13924/
>
> Failures :-/ but no regressions.
>
> Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf 5 xen-boot fail like 13923
>
So, sorry for noticing this only now, but it seems the sedf test is
failing to boot since flight 13900 (Sept 28).
It seems to me that, from hat day on, this particular test is always
running on the same machine (gall-mite). OTOH, 13900 run on a different
one (moss-bug) and worked well.
From a super quick inspection of the logs, I couldn't spot anything
particular that can be causing the failures, so I'm asking here: could
it be something somehow machine-related?
I remember you (IanJ) telling that there might be some problems with the
test system in these days... Is that the case or should I be
investigating more thoroughly? (In the latter case, I think I can have a
look at it next week).
Thanks and Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-05 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-05 6:35 [xen-unstable test] 13924: tolerable FAIL xen.org
2012-10-05 14:46 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2012-10-05 16:38 ` Ian Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1349448373.18984.27.camel@Solace \
--to=raistlin@linux.it \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).