* [xen-unstable test] 13924: tolerable FAIL
@ 2012-10-05 6:35 xen.org
2012-10-05 14:46 ` Dario Faggioli
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: xen.org @ 2012-10-05 6:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: ian.jackson
flight 13924 xen-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/13924/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf 5 xen-boot fail like 13923
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin 10 guest-saverestore fail like 13923
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 9 guest-localmigrate fail like 13923
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 9 guest-localmigrate fail like 13923
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9 guest-start fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win 13 guest-stop fail never pass
version targeted for testing:
xen 032de7030d20
baseline version:
xen 032de7030d20
jobs:
build-amd64 pass
build-i386 pass
build-amd64-oldkern pass
build-i386-oldkern pass
build-amd64-pvops pass
build-i386-pvops pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl pass
test-amd64-i386-xl pass
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd pass
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel fail
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel pass
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu pass
test-amd64-amd64-pair pass
test-amd64-i386-pair pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin fail
test-amd64-amd64-pv pass
test-amd64-i386-pv pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf fail
test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-amd64-win fail
test-amd64-i386-win fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 fail
------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on woking.cam.xci-test.com
logs: /home/xc_osstest/logs
images: /home/xc_osstest/images
Logs, config files, etc. are available at
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs
Test harness code can be found at
http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary
Published tested tree is already up to date.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [xen-unstable test] 13924: tolerable FAIL
2012-10-05 6:35 [xen-unstable test] 13924: tolerable FAIL xen.org
@ 2012-10-05 14:46 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-10-05 16:38 ` Ian Jackson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dario Faggioli @ 2012-10-05 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen.org; +Cc: xen-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1360 bytes --]
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 07:35 +0100, xen.org wrote:
> flight 13924 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/13924/
>
> Failures :-/ but no regressions.
>
> Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf 5 xen-boot fail like 13923
>
So, sorry for noticing this only now, but it seems the sedf test is
failing to boot since flight 13900 (Sept 28).
It seems to me that, from hat day on, this particular test is always
running on the same machine (gall-mite). OTOH, 13900 run on a different
one (moss-bug) and worked well.
From a super quick inspection of the logs, I couldn't spot anything
particular that can be causing the failures, so I'm asking here: could
it be something somehow machine-related?
I remember you (IanJ) telling that there might be some problems with the
test system in these days... Is that the case or should I be
investigating more thoroughly? (In the latter case, I think I can have a
look at it next week).
Thanks and Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-unstable test] 13924: tolerable FAIL
2012-10-05 14:46 ` Dario Faggioli
@ 2012-10-05 16:38 ` Ian Jackson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ian Jackson @ 2012-10-05 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dario Faggioli; +Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 13924: tolerable FAIL"):
> So, sorry for noticing this only now, but it seems the sedf test is
> failing to boot since flight 13900 (Sept 28).
>
> It seems to me that, from hat day on, this particular test is always
> running on the same machine (gall-mite). OTOH, 13900 run on a different
> one (moss-bug) and worked well.
The tester likes to reuse the same machine when the test fails. That
means that when a new machine-specific bug is introduced, it blocks a
push.
> From a super quick inspection of the logs, I couldn't spot anything
> particular that can be causing the failures, so I'm asking here: could
> it be something somehow machine-related?
It's quite possible.
> I remember you (IanJ) telling that there might be some problems with the
> test system in these days... Is that the case or should I be
> investigating more thoroughly? (In the latter case, I think I can have a
> look at it next week).
I am not aware of any problems that might suggest this was a false
failure. Given the test history I would expect that this is a real
bug.
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-10-05 16:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-10-05 6:35 [xen-unstable test] 13924: tolerable FAIL xen.org
2012-10-05 14:46 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-10-05 16:38 ` Ian Jackson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).