From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 3 v2] libxl: take node distances into account during NUMA placement
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 19:00:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1350666041.6053.69.camel@Solace> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09276c114a9a3dcc6058.1350657294@Solace>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 891 bytes --]
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 16:34 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> In fact, among placement candidates with the same number of nodes, the
> closer the various nodes are to each others, the better the performances
> for a domain placed there.
>
So, it seems we need to discuss a bit more about this patch... Please,
ignore it for now.
OTOH, patches 2 and 3 can be considered for further review/ack/commit,
even without this one, as they are pretty much unrelated from this one
(and within each other). I'd expect them to apply cleanly, but if I need
to rebase and resend, let me know.
Thanks and Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-19 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-19 14:34 [PATCH 0 of 3 v2] Some small NUMA placement improvements Dario Faggioli
2012-10-19 14:34 ` [PATCH 1 of 3 v2] libxl: take node distances into account during NUMA placement Dario Faggioli
2012-10-19 17:00 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2012-10-19 14:34 ` [PATCH 2 of 3 v2] libxl, xl: user can ask for min and max nodes to use during placement Dario Faggioli
2012-11-12 16:26 ` Ian Campbell
2012-11-12 16:34 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-10-19 14:34 ` [PATCH 3 of 3 v2] xl: allow for node-wise specification of vcpu pinning Dario Faggioli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1350666041.6053.69.camel@Solace \
--to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@amd.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).