xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
	wei.huang2@amd.com, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	weiwang.dd@gmail.com, xiantao.zhang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IOMMU: don't disable bus mastering on faults for devices used by Xen or Dom0
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 13:06:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1352203585.505.5.camel@Solace> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121106094456.GA45690@ocelot.phlegethon.org>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1504 bytes --]

On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 09:44 +0000, Tim Deegan wrote:
> > In the context of analyzing the situation described in
> > "iommu=dom0-passthrough behavior"
> > (http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2012-11/msg00140.html)
> > I suppressed the IOMMU setup for some device in Dom0, and
> > was quite puzzled to find that only a single fault would occur.
> 
> I think it would be better to allow some small number of faults per
> device before disabling it rather than give dom0 carte blanche.
> 
> This check is really there to stop a mad device from hosing the system
> rather than to contain a malicious OS, and a properly out-of-control
> device needs to be stopped or it will livelock Xen with iommu faults.
> In a uniprocessor system, dom0 might never get the chance to fix it.
> 
Right. But moving the fault handling code to softirq should have already
helped solving/mitigating that, hasn't it?

When implementing and testing that, I wasn't able to reproduce any
livelock situation (although I can't exclude that to be at least partly
due to my inexperience, especially at the time, with I/O
virtualization)... Jan, have you (after killing the 'disable
bus-mastering part' of course)?

Regards,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-11-06 12:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-05 16:53 [PATCH] IOMMU: don't disable bus mastering on faults for devices used by Xen or Dom0 Jan Beulich
2012-11-05 17:15 ` Keir Fraser
2012-11-06  9:08   ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-06  9:44     ` Tim Deegan
2012-11-06 10:19       ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-06 12:08         ` Dario Faggioli
2012-11-06 12:38           ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-06 12:06       ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2012-11-06 12:51         ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-06 13:58           ` Tim Deegan
2012-11-06 14:16             ` Dario Faggioli
2012-11-06 14:17             ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-06 14:29               ` Dario Faggioli
2012-11-08 12:42                 ` Tim Deegan
2012-11-06 14:24           ` Dario Faggioli
2012-11-07 16:05       ` [PATCH, v2] IOMMU: don't immediately disable bus mastering on faults Jan Beulich
2012-11-08 12:46         ` Tim Deegan
2012-11-08 13:46           ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-08 14:23             ` Tim Deegan
2012-11-08 18:07         ` Dario Faggioli
2012-11-30  9:42 ` [PATCH] IOMMU: don't disable bus mastering on faults for devices used by Xen or Dom0 Keir Fraser
2012-11-30  9:50   ` Jan Beulich
2012-12-03  6:08     ` Zhang, Xiantao
2012-12-03  7:36       ` Jan Beulich
2012-12-04  0:55         ` Zhang, Xiantao
2012-12-04  8:19           ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1352203585.505.5.camel@Solace \
    --to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=wei.huang2@amd.com \
    --cc=weiwang.dd@gmail.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    --cc=xiantao.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).