From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: Proposed new "memory capacity claim" hypercall/feature Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 14:23:39 +0100 Message-ID: <1352208219.12977.4.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk> References: <50939A1502000078000A5F61@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <7481128d-3f65-4cc3-ad96-1d4e9cd25094@default> <20121104203532.GA11377@ocelot.phlegethon.org> <26f55aab-7523-4681-9a61-a5e5740d43a9@default> <1352111399.25014.101.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk> <5517445d-ed2e-4592-9a2b-98fc612f1ae8@default> <1352154288.7253.25.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk> <8bec0df2-cf4b-4dcf-bbb8-121357a29d52@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <8bec0df2-cf4b-4dcf-bbb8-121357a29d52@default> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Dan Magenheimer Cc: Olaf Hering , "Keir (Xen.org)" , Konrad Wilk , George Dunlap , Ian Jackson , "Tim (Xen.org)" , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , George Shuklin , DarioFaggioli , Jan Beulich , Kurt Hackel , Zhigang Wang List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 22:58 +0000, Dan Magenheimer wrote: > It's not necessary to choose the _optimal_ fit, only a probable one. I think this is the key point which I was missing i.e. that it doesn't need to be a totally accurate answer. Without that piece it seemed to me that you must already have the more knowledgeable toolstack part which others have mentioned. Ian.