* [PATCH] xen: arm: Call init_xen_time earlier
@ 2012-12-17 15:19 Ian Campbell
2012-12-18 11:42 ` Stefano Stabellini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2012-12-17 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: Ian Campbell
If we panic before calling init_xen_time then the "Rebooting in 5
seconds" delay ends up calling udelay which uses cntfrq before it has
been initialised resulting in a divide by zero.
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
---
xen/arch/arm/setup.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/setup.c b/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
index 2076724..7b0a0f6 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
@@ -219,6 +219,8 @@ void __init start_xen(unsigned long boot_phys_offset,
console_init_preirq();
#endif
+ init_xen_time();
+
gic_init();
make_cpus_ready(cpus, boot_phys_offset);
@@ -227,8 +229,6 @@ void __init start_xen(unsigned long boot_phys_offset,
set_current((struct vcpu *)0xfffff000); /* debug sanity */
idle_vcpu[0] = current;
- init_xen_time();
-
setup_mm(atag_paddr, fdt_size);
/* Setup Hyp vector base */
--
1.7.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] xen: arm: Call init_xen_time earlier
2012-12-17 15:19 [PATCH] xen: arm: Call init_xen_time earlier Ian Campbell
@ 2012-12-18 11:42 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-12-19 14:03 ` Ian Campbell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stefano Stabellini @ 2012-12-18 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Campbell; +Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012, Ian Campbell wrote:
> If we panic before calling init_xen_time then the "Rebooting in 5
> seconds" delay ends up calling udelay which uses cntfrq before it has
> been initialised resulting in a divide by zero.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> xen/arch/arm/setup.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/setup.c b/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
> index 2076724..7b0a0f6 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
> @@ -219,6 +219,8 @@ void __init start_xen(unsigned long boot_phys_offset,
> console_init_preirq();
> #endif
>
> + init_xen_time();
> +
> gic_init();
> make_cpus_ready(cpus, boot_phys_offset);
>
> @@ -227,8 +229,6 @@ void __init start_xen(unsigned long boot_phys_offset,
> set_current((struct vcpu *)0xfffff000); /* debug sanity */
> idle_vcpu[0] = current;
>
> - init_xen_time();
> -
> setup_mm(atag_paddr, fdt_size);
>
> /* Setup Hyp vector base */
> --
> 1.7.9.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xen: arm: Call init_xen_time earlier
2012-12-18 11:42 ` Stefano Stabellini
@ 2012-12-19 14:03 ` Ian Campbell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2012-12-19 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefano Stabellini; +Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 11:42 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2012, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > If we panic before calling init_xen_time then the "Rebooting in 5
> > seconds" delay ends up calling udelay which uses cntfrq before it has
> > been initialised resulting in a divide by zero.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
>
>
> Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Applied, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-12-19 14:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-12-17 15:19 [PATCH] xen: arm: Call init_xen_time earlier Ian Campbell
2012-12-18 11:42 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-12-19 14:03 ` Ian Campbell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).