From: Wei Liu <Wei.Liu2@citrix.com>
To: Rohit Damkondwar <genius.rsd@gmail.com>
Cc: wei.liu2@citrix.com, "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: dynamically set bandwidth limits of a virtual interface
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 10:35:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1356690956.2917.7.camel@iceland> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHEEu857jjBLACY=MNKzqEkpGbjXw1cbfqy9AOyR5fVsuOmagg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 07:46 +0000, Rohit Damkondwar wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Wei Liu <Wei.Liu2@citrix.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-12-27 at 08:46 +0000, Rohit Damkondwar wrote:
> > Hi all. I want to set bandwidth limits to a virtual
> interface
> > dynamically(without restarting virtual machine). I have been
> browsing
> > xen source code 4.1.3. I looked into libxen
> folder(xen_vif.c) and
> > hotplug(linux) folder. Earlier in xen 3.0 , xenvif struture
> > (driver/net/xen-netback/
> > interface.c + common.h) and tx_add_credit function could be
> used to
> > modify rate limits. I want to change bandwidth limits
> dynamically of a
> > virtual interface in xen 4.1.3. Where should I look for in
> xen 4.1.3?
> >
> > Please help.
> >
>
>
> Xen vif has a parameter called 'rate', I don't know whether it
> suits
> you.
>
> The rate parameter only restricts one way traffic(probably only
> outgoing).
>
Yes, you're right. So you need two way shaping.
>
> Also, you can have a look at external tool like tc(8). My
> vague thought
> is that Vif is just another interface in Dom0, tc(8) should be
> able to
> traffic-shape Vif.
>
>
> Don't you think using external tool may decrease the eifficiency ?. If
> xen itself has capabailities ( provided by tc tool ), wouldn't it be
> more efficient ?
>
Do you see significant performance degradation when using tc(8) or any
other tools alike? If so, do report with figures, it can help us
improve.
> I have used this tool. It is good. It serves my purpose. But wudn't it
> be better to include the bandwidth limiting capabilities in xen
> itself? I am not sure about this. Currently I am just browsing through
> the source code. What do u think ?
>
TBH I'm not sure about this either. Again, comparisons and analysis of
bottleneck would be helpful.
>
> I have seen function "set_qos_algorithm_type" and paramaters
> (qos/algorithm type,qos/algorithm params, qos/supported algorithms) in
> vif class. Would they be useful ? Are they available only for XEN
> Enterprise ?
>
Do you see those in libxen source code? I don't think they are in use
now.
Wei.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-28 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-27 8:46 dynamically set bandwidth limits of a virtual interface Rohit Damkondwar
2012-12-27 12:33 ` Wei Liu
2012-12-27 12:38 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2012-12-31 14:14 ` Alex Bligh
2012-12-28 7:46 ` Rohit Damkondwar
2012-12-28 10:35 ` Wei Liu [this message]
2012-12-30 12:08 ` Rohit Damkondwar
2012-12-31 11:30 ` Wei Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1356690956.2917.7.camel@iceland \
--to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=genius.rsd@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).