From: Dongxiao Xu <dongxiao.xu@intel.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: JBeulich@suse.com, eddie.dong@intel.com, xiantao.zhang@intel.com,
jun.nakajima@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 rebased 1/4] nested vmx: Use a list to store the launched vvmcs for L1 VMM
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:32:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1358951532-20302-2-git-send-email-dongxiao.xu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358951532-20302-1-git-send-email-dongxiao.xu@intel.com>
Originally we use a virtual VMCS field to store the launch state of
a certain vmcs. However if we introduce VMCS shadowing feature, this
virtual VMCS should also be able to load into real hardware,
and VMREAD/VMWRITE operate invalid fields.
The new approach is to store the launch state into a list for L1 VMM.
Signed-off-by: Dongxiao Xu <dongxiao.xu@intel.com>
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h | 2 -
xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.h | 6 ++
3 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c
index 90b4da9..cd8bb90 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ int nvmx_vcpu_initialise(struct vcpu *v)
nvmx->iobitmap[0] = NULL;
nvmx->iobitmap[1] = NULL;
nvmx->msrbitmap = NULL;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nvmx->launched_list);
return 0;
out:
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -58,7 +59,9 @@ out:
void nvmx_vcpu_destroy(struct vcpu *v)
{
+ struct nestedvmx *nvmx = &vcpu_2_nvmx(v);
struct nestedvcpu *nvcpu = &vcpu_nestedhvm(v);
+ struct vvmcs_list *item, *n;
/*
* When destroying the vcpu, it may be running on behalf of L2 guest.
@@ -74,6 +77,12 @@ void nvmx_vcpu_destroy(struct vcpu *v)
free_xenheap_page(nvcpu->nv_n2vmcx);
nvcpu->nv_n2vmcx = NULL;
}
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(item, n, &nvmx->launched_list, node)
+ {
+ list_del(&item->node);
+ xfree(item);
+ }
}
void nvmx_domain_relinquish_resources(struct domain *d)
@@ -1202,6 +1211,62 @@ int nvmx_handle_vmxoff(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
return X86EMUL_OKAY;
}
+static bool_t vvmcs_launched(struct list_head *launched_list,
+ unsigned long vvmcs_mfn)
+{
+ struct vvmcs_list *vvmcs;
+ struct list_head *pos;
+ bool_t launched = 0;
+
+ list_for_each(pos, launched_list)
+ {
+ vvmcs = list_entry(pos, struct vvmcs_list, node);
+ if ( vvmcs_mfn == vvmcs->vvmcs_mfn )
+ {
+ launched = 1;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return launched;
+}
+
+static int set_vvmcs_launched(struct list_head *launched_list,
+ unsigned long vvmcs_mfn)
+{
+ struct vvmcs_list *vvmcs;
+
+ if ( vvmcs_launched(launched_list, vvmcs_mfn) )
+ return 0;
+
+ vvmcs = xzalloc(struct vvmcs_list);
+ if ( !vvmcs )
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ vvmcs->vvmcs_mfn = vvmcs_mfn;
+ list_add(&vvmcs->node, launched_list);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void clear_vvmcs_launched(struct list_head *launched_list,
+ paddr_t vvmcs_mfn)
+{
+ struct vvmcs_list *vvmcs;
+ struct list_head *pos;
+
+ list_for_each(pos, launched_list)
+ {
+ vvmcs = list_entry(pos, struct vvmcs_list, node);
+ if ( vvmcs_mfn == vvmcs->vvmcs_mfn )
+ {
+ list_del(&vvmcs->node);
+ xfree(vvmcs);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
int nvmx_vmresume(struct vcpu *v, struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
{
struct nestedvmx *nvmx = &vcpu_2_nvmx(v);
@@ -1225,8 +1290,10 @@ int nvmx_vmresume(struct vcpu *v, struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
int nvmx_handle_vmresume(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
{
- int launched;
+ bool_t launched;
struct vcpu *v = current;
+ struct nestedvcpu *nvcpu = &vcpu_nestedhvm(v);
+ struct nestedvmx *nvmx = &vcpu_2_nvmx(v);
if ( vcpu_nestedhvm(v).nv_vvmcxaddr == VMCX_EADDR )
{
@@ -1234,8 +1301,8 @@ int nvmx_handle_vmresume(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
return X86EMUL_OKAY;
}
- launched = __get_vvmcs(vcpu_nestedhvm(v).nv_vvmcx,
- NVMX_LAUNCH_STATE);
+ launched = vvmcs_launched(&nvmx->launched_list,
+ domain_page_map_to_mfn(nvcpu->nv_vvmcx));
if ( !launched ) {
vmreturn (regs, VMFAIL_VALID);
return X86EMUL_OKAY;
@@ -1245,9 +1312,11 @@ int nvmx_handle_vmresume(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
int nvmx_handle_vmlaunch(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
{
- int launched;
+ bool_t launched;
int rc;
struct vcpu *v = current;
+ struct nestedvcpu *nvcpu = &vcpu_nestedhvm(v);
+ struct nestedvmx *nvmx = &vcpu_2_nvmx(v);
if ( vcpu_nestedhvm(v).nv_vvmcxaddr == VMCX_EADDR )
{
@@ -1255,8 +1324,8 @@ int nvmx_handle_vmlaunch(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
return X86EMUL_OKAY;
}
- launched = __get_vvmcs(vcpu_nestedhvm(v).nv_vvmcx,
- NVMX_LAUNCH_STATE);
+ launched = vvmcs_launched(&nvmx->launched_list,
+ domain_page_map_to_mfn(nvcpu->nv_vvmcx));
if ( launched ) {
vmreturn (regs, VMFAIL_VALID);
return X86EMUL_OKAY;
@@ -1264,8 +1333,12 @@ int nvmx_handle_vmlaunch(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
else {
rc = nvmx_vmresume(v,regs);
if ( rc == X86EMUL_OKAY )
- __set_vvmcs(vcpu_nestedhvm(v).nv_vvmcx,
- NVMX_LAUNCH_STATE, 1);
+ {
+ if ( set_vvmcs_launched(&nvmx->launched_list,
+ domain_page_map_to_mfn(nvcpu->nv_vvmcx)) < 0 )
+ return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE;
+ }
+
}
return rc;
}
@@ -1332,6 +1405,7 @@ int nvmx_handle_vmclear(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
struct vcpu *v = current;
struct vmx_inst_decoded decode;
struct nestedvcpu *nvcpu = &vcpu_nestedhvm(v);
+ struct nestedvmx *nvmx = &vcpu_2_nvmx(v);
unsigned long gpa = 0;
void *vvmcs;
int rc;
@@ -1348,7 +1422,8 @@ int nvmx_handle_vmclear(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
if ( gpa == nvcpu->nv_vvmcxaddr )
{
- __set_vvmcs(nvcpu->nv_vvmcx, NVMX_LAUNCH_STATE, 0);
+ clear_vvmcs_launched(&nvmx->launched_list,
+ domain_page_map_to_mfn(nvcpu->nv_vvmcx));
nvmx_purge_vvmcs(v);
}
else
@@ -1356,7 +1431,8 @@ int nvmx_handle_vmclear(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
/* Even if this VMCS isn't the current one, we must clear it. */
vvmcs = hvm_map_guest_frame_rw(gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT, 0);
if ( vvmcs )
- __set_vvmcs(vvmcs, NVMX_LAUNCH_STATE, 0);
+ clear_vvmcs_launched(&nvmx->launched_list,
+ domain_page_map_to_mfn(vvmcs));
hvm_unmap_guest_frame(vvmcs, 0);
}
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h
index 51df81e..9ff741f 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h
@@ -421,8 +421,6 @@ enum vmcs_field {
HOST_SYSENTER_EIP = 0x00006c12,
HOST_RSP = 0x00006c14,
HOST_RIP = 0x00006c16,
- /* A virtual VMCS field used for nestedvmx only */
- NVMX_LAUNCH_STATE = 0x00006c20,
};
#define VMCS_VPID_WIDTH 16
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.h
index 9e1dc77..89e839f 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.h
@@ -23,6 +23,11 @@
#ifndef __ASM_X86_HVM_VVMX_H__
#define __ASM_X86_HVM_VVMX_H__
+struct vvmcs_list {
+ unsigned long vvmcs_mfn;
+ struct list_head node;
+};
+
struct nestedvmx {
paddr_t vmxon_region_pa;
void *iobitmap[2]; /* map (va) of L1 guest I/O bitmap */
@@ -38,6 +43,7 @@ struct nestedvmx {
uint32_t exit_qual;
} ept;
uint32_t guest_vpid;
+ struct list_head launched_list;
};
#define vcpu_2_nvmx(v) (vcpu_nestedhvm(v).u.nvmx)
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-23 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-23 14:32 [PATCH v5 rebased 0/4] nested vmx: enable VMCS shadowing feature Dongxiao Xu
2013-01-23 14:32 ` Dongxiao Xu [this message]
2013-01-25 2:13 ` [PATCH v5 rebased 1/4] nested vmx: Use a list to store the launched vvmcs for L1 VMM Dong, Eddie
2013-01-23 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 rebased 2/4] nested vmx: use VMREAD/VMWRITE to construct vVMCS if enabled VMCS shadowing Dongxiao Xu
2013-01-25 2:26 ` Dong, Eddie
2013-01-23 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 rebased 3/4] nested vmx: optimize for bulk access of virtual VMCS Dongxiao Xu
2013-01-25 2:27 ` Dong, Eddie
2013-01-23 14:32 ` [PATCH v5 rebased 4/4] nested vmx: enable VMCS shadowing feature Dongxiao Xu
2013-01-23 14:55 ` Nakajima, Jun
2013-01-25 2:28 ` Dong, Eddie
2013-01-29 10:19 ` [PATCH v5 rebased 0/4] " Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1358951532-20302-2-git-send-email-dongxiao.xu@intel.com \
--to=dongxiao.xu@intel.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=xiantao.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).