From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dario Faggioli Subject: Re: [PATCH 4 of 5 v3] xen: tracing: introduce per-scheduler trace event IDs Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 11:40:49 +0100 Message-ID: <1362825649.24895.12.camel@Abyss> References: <4e6b8af4ad97bfeef529.1355783341@Solace> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5001632992612178460==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: George Dunlap Cc: George Dunlap , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "Keir (Xen.org)" , Ian Campbell List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============5001632992612178460== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-vldOnrgTAEszj74Ta1hE" --=-vldOnrgTAEszj74Ta1hE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On ven, 2013-03-08 at 16:08 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Dario Faggioli > > This also converts the existing credit2 tracing (the only scheduler > > generating tracing events up to now) to the new system. >=20 > Dario, do you have xenalyze patches for this changeset somewhere? >=20 TBH, I haven't done any xenalyze modification, corresponding to this. However, I'm not really sure it's necessary. Well, let me put it this way, I run xenalyze on traces collected with this change, and everything works, and the scheduler-id is shown in the event. OF course we could improve the situation by decoding it in xenalyze and showing it explicitly in the trace analysis. I (if this is what you were referring to) agree it would be nice, but again, it's not something I've done yet, and not something I can commit on doing in the next days either. :-( I don't think it's terrible, as the change only affect traces where the actual event is also reported encoded, so you have to go check the headers (or remember stuff) anyway. Again, I completely agree it would be nice to limit the amount of stuff one has to remember, and I'm up for it, just not immediately... Is that fine/enough? Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-vldOnrgTAEszj74Ta1hE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlE7EbIACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTYjACdFPh29G4NjKvm1jeP9g6vSsv9 sVcAnRFcMJXcTYsyr7wTvL2vptPFjnil =hXnQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-vldOnrgTAEszj74Ta1hE-- --===============5001632992612178460== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel --===============5001632992612178460==--